Google’s Gangland Case: Shooting The Messenger Or Should Digital Platforms Be Liable As A Publisher?
Google has again come into the firing line in a recent defamation case, revealing that Australian courts are prepared to hold digital platforms to task. As the power and influence of digital platforms grows, so has the controversy around just how liable Google, Twitter, Facebook and other online intermediaries should be for the content they share. In this piece, advertising and media legal experts Heidi Bruce, principal, and Winnie Lok, solicitor, of Anisimoff Legal, join B&T to discuss these developments and the broader media impact.
Pressure has been mounting in Australia for digital platforms to be held to higher standards of accountability as shown by the ACCC Digital Platforms Inquiry and the regulatory outcomes of that Inquiry which are now unfolding. This issue has hit the headlines in a big way with the US President Trump recently commencing a war on Twitter and pushing for stronger regulation of Twitter and other social media platforms.
Google was recently ordered by the High Court to pay $40,000 in damages to Melbourne lawyer George Defteros for publishing results that associated him with gangland figures and defamed him.
Bruce told B&T: “The Google and Defteros decision is controversial as it shows this legal trend in Australia, towards stronger liability for digital platforms. The court had to consider whether Google was simply an innocent messenger, or whether it was liable as a publisher.
“The High Court decided here that Google is liable. There is a push towards evening up the balance between digital platforms on the one hand and traditional publishers like news outlets and broadcasters on the other. Our laws are out of step with the influence and reach of these technologies, but our courts are willing to stretch them to hold these parties accountable.”
Lok added: “The case stretches beyond the social media giants, it has broader impacts for other online providers, including businesses that operate forums, online tools or comparison services, or Facebook pages. They can’t simply continue to view themselves as if they are innocent bystanders.”
In the early 2000s, Defteros ran a criminal law firm in Melbourne whose clients included many prominent gangland figures. In 2004, Defteros was charged with conspiracy to murder Carl Williams, his father and bodyguard. Defteros denied the charges and the charges were withdrawn.
In 2016, Defteros became aware that when searching his name on Google, the search results produced an article published by The Age in 2004 in relation to his charges, headed ‘Underworld loses valued friend at court’.
Defteros notified Google and requested that the article be removed from the search results. After Google’s failure to remove the article, Defteros sued Google for defamation, as the search results would lead readers to think that he was more than just a lawyer, he had become a confidant and friend of criminals.
The big issue in the Defteros case was whether Google could be liable as a publisher for the content that appears in its search results. At first glance, this may seem outlandish. How could Google be responsible for automated results of third-party content that depend on keywords entered by users?
The court found Google was liable for the publication by way of omission. Google’s failure to remove the article after being notified by Defteros meant that Google was responsible for the continued publication of the defamatory content. The court importantly held that, even though Google’s search engine was fully automated, Google was still considered a “publisher” on the basis that with human intervention, objectionable content could be identified and removed.
Google tried to rely on the defence of ‘innocent dissemination’ under section 32 of Defamation Act 2005 (Vic), that as a secondary publisher exercising reasonable care, they did not or would not have known that the material was defamatory. However, the court found that innocent dissemination was not available to Google as they were aware of the material after being notified by Defteros.
The court found that the defence had lapsed seven days after Google had been put on notice. Lok says, “So in a nutshell, as Google had the ability to remove content, and it was aware of the defamation and did nothing, it was liable. They were no longer an ‘innocent messenger’. You could say that once Google is put on notice it has at the most, 7 days to remove the content before it loses its defence.”
This is not Google’s first brush with a defamation lawsuit. In a similar scenario in 2016, Milorad Trkulja was successful in claiming that Google was responsible for search results and auto-completions that were defamatory as it linked Trkulja’s name and image to Melbourne’s criminal underworld. The High Court ruled that Google’s participation in showing the results to users made it the publisher.
Google has also been sued by the ACCC for misleading or deceptive conduct, for displaying sponsored ads that were generated through its AdWords by advertisers in its search results. The High Court here decided that Google was not liable. In publishing the sponsored ads, Google was simply carrying out the advertiser’s instructions, and Google was not endorsing the information displayed in the advertisement. The Court considered that consumers would understand that the ‘sponsored’ links are ads that have been paid for by businesses to appear on search results pages.
Google successfully relied here on an “innocent messenger” defence, in Section 251 of the Australian Consumer Law. This defence provides that a party is not liable for breaching the Australian Consumer Law if they a) publish or arrange for the publication of advertisements; b) received the advertisement for publication in the ordinary course of business; and c) did not know or had no reason to suspect that the publication of the advertisement would breach the Australian Consumer Law.
Bruce commented: “Unlike in Defteros, the ‘sponsored links’ case was favourable for Google and digital platforms. However, if Google had been notified that the sponsored ads contained misleading claims and failed to remove it, Google may very well have been liable. The current thinking of the courts as we have now seen is, once Google knows about a breach and does nothing, it is no longer an innocent messenger. This could leave digital platforms in uncomfortable situations where they receive complaints on content that look fine on the surface, but they take a risk by turning a blind eye.”
The Defteros case has broader implications on digital platforms, but also operators of online forums, Facebook pages or review platforms. This is strengthened by a very recent NSW Court of Appeals decision, holding media companies (ie Fairfax Media, Nationwide News and Australian News Channel), liable for allegedly defamatory comments made on their Facebook pages. These comments were written by third party users, under stories on the media companies’ Facebook pages. They were not pre-vetted. However as they allowed people to post comments, and had the means to delete posts when they became aware they were defamatory, they were liable as a publisher.
These cases show that a business does not need to be the original publisher to be liable for defamation law. Even if the content is written by a third party user on a Facebook page, or shared on Facebook, or comes up on a Google search, an online business may not be merely an innocent messenger, free from liability. Once it is notified that material is potentially defamatory or misleading, it then risks being liable if it does nothing. The Australian Government has flagged a major overhaul to defamation laws, and also set up a road map for changes to the regulation of digital platforms.
Bruce said: “We are seeing a move towards stronger liability for digital platforms. The regulators and the courts are seeing that the freedoms enjoyed by digital platforms in their formative years are now out of date. We still have traditional news publishers and broadcasters very heavily regulated, but a much lighter set of rules for digital platforms. In Australia the future looks to be heading towards evening up that balance.”
To discuss a related media or advertising legal issue with one of the experts at Anisimoff Legal please contact us here or email us at enquiries@anisimoff.com.au
Latest News
Choose A Path Less Trodden This Cannes In Cairns
Don’t be basic. Think creatively and you shall reap the benefits of Cannes in Cairns. “We want brands!” “We want the CMOs!” We heard you and we acted. The content slate at this year’s Cannes in Cairns, presented by Pinterest, is packed to the rafters with some epic brands and top marketing talent. But that’s […]
Cannes In Cairns MC Keeva Stratton Shares Her Top Session Picks
Self-professed nerd and one of four top Cannes in Cairns, presented by Pinterest MCs, Keeva Stratton has a front-row seat to some fascinating minds and fierce debates. But who should you put on your must-see, must-hear list? Here, B&T grabs five with the Quip agency founder, who will be helming the lecture in the Rainforest […]
Here Are The Agencies That Made AFR’s Best Places To Work List And What The Industry Can Learn From Them
Did your office not make the list? Make sure your boss shouts at least two schooners at office drinks come Friday.
Get Ready, B&T’s Best Of The Best Is Back With The Top Holding Company Executive Leaders – Creative!
Want to know who the Grandest of the Grand Poobahs in the industry are? Look no further than this exhaustive list.
How A Glittering Campaign Helped The Australian Museum Sell 400,000 Tickets
B&T thoroughly enjoyed the Ramses exhibition at The Australian Museum, despite thinking we were going to the Archibald.
TV Ratings (30/04/2024): A “Shoey” Straight From A Fish’s Mouth Launches The Cheap Seats Into 2024
Last night's TV saw horny farmers beat Lego nerds, who beat fame-obsessed home cooks, who beat a chap with a large fish.
Spotlight Extends Partnership With Starlight Children’s Foundation
B&T always happy to promote the excellent work of the Starlight Foundation. Less so the Starfish Fanciers Foundation.
Amazon’s Advertising Quarterly Revenue Soars To $11.8bn
There are so many Amazon couriers visiting B&T headquarters at the moment our office dog doesn't know who to maul first.
VML Wellington Welcomes Jacob McGregor As Pou Ārahi Māori
McGregor set to lead cultural competency and safety at VML Wellington in important new gig.
“They Grow Up So Fast”: Simon Fowler On Five Years Of ABEL
Abel's CEO talks lessons learned from the agency's first five years. Including staff nicking all the Nespresso capsules.
Kyle & Jackie O Urge Melbourne To Pick A Side
Who can stop Kyle & Jackie O's indelible march into Melbourne radio? Is Peter 'Moony' Moon waiting by the phone?
Future & Taika Waititi Feature In Striking New Global Belvedere Campaign
Not only does drinking vodka make you cool like these dudes, it also has great weight loss properties for the bone idle.
The Fall Of Bonza: A Case Study In How To, And Not To, React In A Crisis
Does the collapse of yet another budget airline hark back to a gentler time of 17 hours spent on a Greyhound bus?
Opinion: Agencies, Be Unique – Stop Using The Word “Unique!”
Trinity P3's Ellie Angell says agencies are overusing the word unique. You could add omnichannel & holisitic to that.
Ex Marketing & Advertising Exec Releases Melanoma Memoir
Ex-adlander Anne Gately has penned a tome to skin cancer. Which is a handy reminder to check your moles, people.
Mamamia Appoint Danni Wright As New Head Of Strategy
Danni Wright takes up Mamamia's strategy reins with a feng shui expert called over positioning of office chaise lounge.
From The Bureau: Championing Competency & Cross-Industry Collaboration
The IAB's Jonas Jaanimagi calls for more specialisation in adtech. Meaning you'll understand it less than you already do.
Rumble Nabs Renee Park From Cutting Edge
Rumble has recruited Renee Park as one of its new sound designers. And it's only right to make some noise about it.
iD Collective Teams Up With City Of Parramatta To Amp Up NRL Fan Experience
Adland's often lampooned for never going further west than Surry Hills. So this Parramatta news is welcome indeed.
Slew Of New Hires At The Company We Keep
The Company We Keep announces new hires. Here's hoping it doesn't impact the RBA's interest rate decision.
UnDigital Announces Brand Refresh Helping Clients Achieve More Than 600% Sales Increase
Warning - this headline comes with some obscene bragging. Much like the B&T editor's 5/8 in the weekend footy tipping.
Microsoft Advertising: “We Make The Complicated Simple”
Microsoft ads wants to make the complicated simple. The total opposite to Korean restaurant menus & the recent Yes vote.
TV Ratings 29/4/24: Farmer Wants A Wife And Lego Masters Lock Horns In Overnight’s Battle
Who won the battle of the big guns - Lego or Farmer Wants A Wife? One thing's for sure, it wasn't Great Train Journeys.
Nielsen Data Reveals Brands Spending Big To Attract Aussie Tourists
Nielsen Ad Intel data has revealed that the travel and tourism industry spent more than $153 million on advertising in Australia in Q1, 2024 – an increase of 8 per cent from the previous quarter, with TripADeal the biggest spender, followed by Virgin Australia, then the Flight Centre-owned Ignite Travel. As many Australians return from […]
IAS Awarded New Responsible AI Certification From Trustarc
Integral Ad Science tossing up over the mahogany or teak frame after being awarded TRUSTe Responsible AI Certification.
AWARD Calls For Hall Of Fame Nominations
B&T's noms for AWARD Hall of Famer includes Louis The Fly, Chums' talking Scottie dog & Mumbrella's coke dealer.
Havas Red Wins PagerDuty PR Account
Havas Red wins PagerDuty's PR. And judging by B&T having to Google PagerDuty, it could probably do with some help.
ACA Poised To Release Results Of 2023 Create Space Census
The Advertising Council unveils date for its census results. Hey, why not coincide it with an office lamington drive?
Why Fear Is Essential To Fernando Machado’s Creativity
If there's anyone B&T loves to chat to, it's fabled marketer Fernando Machado. Although the 5am time difference sucks.
Superdry Drafts AFL’s Patrick Lipinski For New Campaign
B&T fast regretting that poncho we just bought, as it appears the puffer jacket returns as winter's hottest trend.
Elon Musk vs eSafety: Legal Experts Warn That ‘Rogue Operators’ Like X Are Unlikely To Win Federal Court Battle
If this legal stoush boils down to who can afford the better lawyers, B&T's backing Mr Musk every single time.
Amy Poehler Presents First Look At Inside Out 2 At Vivid Sydney 2024
Vivid isn't about freezing your arse off while looking at lights on a wall, as you'll learn with this Amy Poehler news.
Mutinex Launches DataOS Improving Data Warehousing & Quality For MMM Marketers
Work in marketing? Does your data warehousing resemble a teenager's bedroom? Here's a Marie Kondo-approved read.
IMAA Celebrates Three Years Of Group Trade Credit Insurance Deal
Are you a struggling indie? Thinking of firebombing the building for the insurance money? IMAA has you covered here.
Adam Sandler Seemingly ‘Slams’ Ukraine In Pro-Kremlin Campaign
Host of A-list celebs caught slamming Ukraine's president. Thankfully it does have the Milli Vanillis about it.
New Marketing & Comms Agency For Defence & Aerospace Industry Takes Flight
As painful as this is to say, judging by current world events, the bomb & tank industries must be in rude health.