Aldi Potato Ad Gets Roasted By Ad Standards Over Christmas

Aldi Potato Ad Gets Roasted By Ad Standards Over Christmas

Aldi’s Christmas ad is among a series of ads to be discontinued after complaints that it breached the AANA code of ethics in relation to discrimination, violence, and health and safety.

In a series of complaints, ALDI was called out for depicting a severed head on a dining table… it’s a singing potato, Karen, showing an elderly man being pulled over with what appears to be blood covering his hands (but is later revealed to be strawberry juice), being insensitive of people with skin conditions in their personified depiction of a baked potato and promoting the use of outdoor BBQs inside.

ALDI quickly defended its “Go Big on the Little Things” campaign, created in partnership with BMF, Zenith Media and Ogilvy PR. The retail giant responded to the complaints, highlighting other “exaggerated” campaigns from previous years. “ALDI wishes to advise that its marketing and communications strategy typically uses quirky, exaggerated or fantastical elements mixed with relatable humour for its brand campaigns to reach its target audience, showcase how it is ‘Good Different’, and deliver engaging and memorable advertisements. ALDI has adopted this strategy for its brand campaigns for some time now with minimal issue,” ALDI said in their official response.

The ad was found to breach Section 2.6: Advertising shall not depict material contrary to Prevailing Community Standards on health and safety for its depiction of indoor barbequing. However, on all other grounds, the ad was found to not be in breach. ALDI accepted the decision and agreed to remove all future dates for the 60″ ad, noting that the 30″ spot doesn’t contain the BBQ scene.

Disney+ also came under fire over the holiday season after complaints were made against their Hallowstream OOH campaign placement. The campaign, which featured scenes from a Disney’s Halloween-themed offering, reportedly frightened a young child when it appeared in a Perth train station.

Disney responded to the complaint by saying that “the Advertisement was aimed at a general entertainment audience and was intended to showcase the diverse range of Halloween-themed and scary content available on Disney+, including PG, M and MA15+ rated content (although none of the actual excerpts featured in the Advertisement are rated any higher than PG)”.

The campaign was found to be in breach of Section 2.3: Advertising shall not present or portray violence unless it is justifiable in the context of the product or service advertised. Disney had already concluded the campaign eight weeks before the decision and has no plans to reinstate it.

The Fox Tan was also on the hit list after their campaign was found to contain material contrary to Prevailing Community Standards on health and safety for promoting unsafe sun exposure. The advertiser did not respond to the complaints or findings.




Please login with linkedin to comment

AANA Aldi banned ad Disney Disney Plus the fox tan

Latest News

ABC Launches Two New Channels Combining Kids, Family & General Titles
  • Media

ABC Launches Two New Channels Combining Kids, Family & General Titles

The ABC will introduce two new channels in June—ABC Family and ABC Entertains—and four new innovative digital streams that will combine the best kids’, family, and general entertainment titles. The new channels will make it easier for audiences to find the programs they love. They will showcase the ABC’s catalogue of family and entertainment programs […]

Wests Tigers Lose One Million Dollar Sponsorship Deal In Hagipantelis Fallout
  • Marketing

Wests Tigers Lose One Million Dollar Sponsorship Deal In Hagipantelis Fallout

The Wests Tigers have confirmed that Brydens Lawyers will end their one-million-dollar partnership with the club at the end of the 2024 season. The law firm first joined the club in 2015 and upgraded to a principal shirtfront partnership in 2016. In an official statement shared to the Tigers’ website today, it was announced the […]