Lessons From The UGG Boot: Why Protecting Your (Global) Brand Is Paramount

Lessons From The UGG Boot: Why Protecting Your (Global) Brand Is Paramount
SHARE
THIS



In this opinion piece, Sharon Givoni (pictured below), a Melbourne-based intellectual property lawyer, says there’s plenty of lessons to be learned for brands in the current UGG brouhaha…

Anyone in marketing would know that it is always a good idea to register your trade marks to protect them for your business. In fact there’s a little saying that’s been going around, especially when it comes to the topic of UGG boots: “Don’t be an Ugg. Register your trade mark before it gets Ugg-ly”

HR_P_PHOTO-of-Sharon-e1457251142474

While it seems that there are many trademarks registered in Australia using the word “UGG” in some form or another, with owners happily using them, the situation is not so straightforward when it comes to use of the word in the US.

The key message arising from UGG trade marks is that in a global economy, it is important to protect your trade marks in any countries overseas where you may want to sell your products.

Fights over this word have had a long history. Way back in the early 70s, Australian surfer Shane Stedman registered the name “UGH-BOOTS” as an Australian trade mark for sheepskin boots.

Then, in the late 70s, another Australian surfer, Brian Smith, bought several pairs of the boots to the US and sold them in New York, eventually setting up his own company called Ugg Holdings Inc.

After over a decade of using and promoting the “UGG” brand in the US, Brian Smith sold Ugg Holdings Inc. to US company, Deckers Outdoor Corporation Pty Ltd, who then started selling the shoes in the US and registered various US trade marks for the word “UGG”, as well as a logo containing the word “UGG”.

This is pretty much where the drama began. In 1999, Deckers began sending out threatening letters to Australian UGG boot manufacturers requesting that they stop selling the boots by reference to the brand name “UGG”. They had their UGG trade mark safely registered in the US which entitles them to exclusive rights their.

Hardly surprising then that the Australian companies were unhappy about this development and grouped together to form the Australian Sheepskin Association Inc.

The association claimed that the word “UGG” had been used all the way back since the 1920s and no one, including Deckers, should be able to own it for themselves.

At the time, the general manager of a major sheepskin boots company was quoted as saying that the word UGG was “as generic as a meat pie or tomato sauce”. Another UGG boot manufacture lamented that if they had to stop using the word “UGG”, they would basically be prevented from “a right to own their own history.”

This comes down to the basic question of whether “UGG” is a brand name or generic term. In other words, does the word UGG automatically refer to a flat-heeled pull-on soft sheepskin boot or does it refer to a specific brand?

The whole thing was resolve – albeit indirectly – when the Australian Trade Marks Office removed the “ugh” and “ugh-boots” trade marks for non-use. Further, to date, the Australian trade marks register shows that there are approximately 140 registered trade marks incorporating the word “UGG”.

The issues with the use of the word “UGG” resurfaced in 2010, the court ruled that Luda Production Pty Ltd had the right to use and register three different “UGG AUSTRALIA” trade marks in spite of Decker’s opposition to all three, based on factors including reputation and prior use (Decker has owned an UGG trade mark in Australia since 1999).

The difficulty with all of this is in the international use of the word “UGG”. Despite anything that happens in Australia, the fact of the matter is that Deckers still owns the UGG trade mark in the US and the argument they would run is that people in the US would recognise the word “UGG” exclusively with their shoes.

Australian companies may be fine to manufacturer and sell in Australia, but then will run into issues when the start selling online to international customers. Even if an Australian company does not have a shop front or is actively marketing to US customers, if they do in fact sell and ship there, it could be trade mark infringement.

This is what has happened to Eddie Oygur, of Australian Leather who has found himself in hot water with Deckers for selling online to US customers.

Further it could happen to any other manufacturers of UGG boots that come up if they try to leave the safe shores of Australia, and businesses that could spend thousands defending any action brought by Deckers.

The lesson is that, if you do have a trade mark, you only do you need to be protected and registered in Australia, but also in any others countries you will be using it in.

The other thing to bear in mind is that iconic words can be trade marked even though they might seem cultural, iconic or generic, including:

  • BLOOD OATH (for clothing and alcoholic beverages);
  • G’DAY (for cosmetic goods);
  • a “SHE’LL BE RIGHT” logo (for clothing); and
  • TRUE BLUE (for alcohol).

What can we gather from all this? One, is to think ahead.

If you have an Australian brand with plans to expand overseas, register it as a trade mark in all relevant countries. Otherwise, someone else can get in first in that country.

Two, is to take steps that ensure your trad mark does not become generic. Use the ® symbol with it once it is registered and if others use it despite your trade mark registration seek advice to see if you can take legal steps to stop them.

This article was written by Sharon Givoni, a Melbourne-based intellectual property lawyer that advises clients in many areas of the law, including branding and marketing Australia-wide. She has recently written a book titled “Owning It: A Creatives Guide to Copyright, Contracts and the Law”, which has been a huge success and she can be contacted on: 0410 557 907 and info@iplegal.com.au.

This article is not to be relied upon as a substitute to tailored legal advice and is intended as a general overview of the subject matter only.

Please login with linkedin to comment

Latest News

AI – To Join It Or To Beat It
  • Media
  • Opinion

AI – To Join It Or To Beat It

I'm afraid we can't let you read this piece Dave! That's a joke about A Space Odyssey 2001, young B&T readers.

Opinion

by B&T Magazine

B&T Magazine
AnalogFolk Opens In Shanghai
  • Advertising

AnalogFolk Opens In Shanghai

AnalogFolk has opened in Shanghai and, as B&T's trusty Funk & Wagnalls atlas tell us, is somewhere near Wollongong.

Social TV – Will You Be At The Party?
  • Advertising
  • Marketing
  • Media
  • Opinion

Social TV – Will You Be At The Party?

Can't keep-up with the goings-on in the Aussie TV industry? Well, hit the couch, pull on the trakkie daks & peruse this.

Opinion

by Rochelle Burbury

Rochelle Burbury
JWT Melbourne Hooks John West’s Creative
  • Advertising

JWT Melbourne Hooks John West’s Creative

You'd only need snog a B&T staffer to know of our affection for the John West oysters in aspic & smoked mackerel ranges.

by B&T Magazine

B&T Magazine
Sydney-Based Tech Marketing Firm, Law Of The Jungle, Scoops Top International Gong
  • Marketing

Sydney-Based Tech Marketing Firm, Law Of The Jungle, Scoops Top International Gong

Sydney-based online cloud solution for marketing compliance, Law of the Jungle, has beaten the world’s best firms to win a prestigious RegTech Markets 2017 Spotlight Award. RegTech Markets, a global community for regulatory technology, inaugurated these awards to “shine a light on the world’s best and brightest RegTech companies”.  A panel of 30 industry experts […]

Is This The Bleakest Christmas Ad Ever?
  • Campaigns

Is This The Bleakest Christmas Ad Ever?

Tired of pretty people pulling bon-bons in your Christmas campaigns? Well, here's one to slash the wrists to instead.

by B&T Magazine

B&T Magazine
The Truth About Native Advertising!
  • Opinion

The Truth About Native Advertising!

Do you stammer about the office, railing against native advertising's great untruths? Read this and stop scaring people.

Opinion

by B&T Magazine

B&T Magazine
Why Are We Only Just Starting To Use VR To Train Staff?
  • Opinion
  • Technology

Why Are We Only Just Starting To Use VR To Train Staff?

In this opinion piece, PHD’s news business and marketing manager, Chloe Hooper (pictured below), argues why all agencies should be embracing VR to change the way they operate internally. Virtual reality (VR) is something most of us have had exposure to, but how many of us are really exploiting its potential to grow our people […]

Opinion

by B&T Magazine

B&T Magazine
PRIA Announces Winners Of 41st National Golden Target Awards
  • Marketing

PRIA Announces Winners Of 41st National Golden Target Awards

The Public Relations Institute of Australia (PRIA) last night announced the winners of the 41st National Golden Target Awards at a glittering ceremony hosted by Aussie actor and TV host Shane Jacobson at the Sydney Opera House. A sold-out crowd of more than 160 PR and communication professionals from around the country came together to […]

Personalisation At Scale: Targeting Audiences With People-based Marketing
  • Marketing
  • Opinion

Personalisation At Scale: Targeting Audiences With People-based Marketing

In this opinion piece, Indy Khabra (pictured below), national managing director at Amnet ANZ, explains power of the the people-based marketing equation, and also reminds marketers that they cannot afford to take data for granted. We are all talking about it. We all want it. We are all trying to get it. It’s that one-to-one […]

Opinion

by B&T Magazine

B&T Magazine