Why It Was Fairfax’s ‘Tweets’ That Ultimately Defamed The Treasurer

Australian Treasurer Joe Hockey (left) arrives with his wife Melissa Babbage to his defamation case at the Federal Court in Sydney, Thursday, March 12, 2015. Mr Hockey has brought legal action against Fairfax Media over a series of stories in their newspapers The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age and The Canberra Times in May, under the headline
SHARE
THIS



Last week the treasurer Joe Jockey was awarded $200,000 in damages after a court ruled that Fairfax Media (publisher of The Sydney Morning Herald in which the headline appeared) had defamed him. But as Walter Adamson, general manager for KINSHIP Digital reveals in this opinion piece, it wasn’t actually the newspaper that defamed him rather it was the tweets linked with the article that were Fairfax’s ultimate undoing.

Last week the Australian treasurer Joe Hockey won a phyrric victory in a defamation case against a newspaper publisher not for the articles which were published about him but on the basis of tweets which linked to the articles. Although commentators said that there is little novel about the ruling and the decision on these issues was unsurprising and orthodox given the principles of defamation law we are not so sure.

The “Twitter matters” 

Perhaps this case is “unsurprising and orthodox” only to those who have not actually read the judgment. We found a number of surprises, including these:

  • The Court looked past a previous ruling which essentially said that by including a link a tweet should be read in conjunction with the linked material, unlike a billboard or newspaper poster. This Hockey judgment directly equated one of the defamatory tweets to a newspaper poster even though it contained a link;
  • In the case of two tweets which were said to be essentially the same one was found to be defamatory and the other not; and,
  • The Court made it clear that meta-data and surrounding web context were part of the consideration of a tweet – using the term “Tweet matter” to encompass the bare tweet plus the context which surrounded it.

In addition, in a small quirk of the case, the Court declared a computer-generated time-stamp on one tweet to be “clearly as mistake” which is an interesting snippet. Does it mean that in a case where time-stamps matter an opinion can override their factual base? It’s hard to image a Twitter time-stamp being incorrect although courts have made bigger calls before such as jailing Galileo Galilei for suggesting the earth revolved around the sun!

Some description

The Three Twitter matters

The Federal Court of Australia considered three tweets which it referred to as “Twitter matters”, these matters taking into consideration not just the text of the tweet but the surrounding context including links and summaries and images attached to the tweet. This is important because some of that context may have been generated automatically by Twitter itself e.g. summaries and images.

Some description

The key issue which the Court considered in relation to the tweets (in our lay terms) was whether the tweets stood alone in the same way that a poster for a newspaper article is treated separately at law from the article to which it relates. The Court had determined that the articles themselves were not defamatory but had determined that the newspaper posters promoting the article were defamatory in relation to a couple of the Treasurer’s imputations.

The Court also considered whether the surrounding context of the tweet, as mentioned above, was to play a role in determining whether or not each “Tweet matter” may be defamatory and even accounted for the possibility of this context being generated by Twitter itself. Its conclusion was that the context did play a role in the consideration of defamation whether automatically generated or not, and that the context should be taken into consideration as part of each of the three “Twitter matter” being reviewed.

The proposition was put that there was a fundamental difference between a poster and tweet in that a tweet provided a simple and fast way to link through to the article, and this “ease of access” to the article per se should be taken into account. However the Court rejected this submission with the following statement:

“The greater ease by which the reader may obtain access to the article in question is not a reason for concluding that all readers of the tweet will exercise that access. Some may read the tweet without going further.”

The final consideration was that the (first Tweet matter) “bare tweet” was defamatory, the (second Tweet matter) tweet with narrative context was defamatory, and the (third Tweet matter) tweet described as a “tweet and article” was not defamatory because the Court ruled that it would have been read “in conjunction with the hyperlinked article”.

Avoiding defamation – it is not clear cut but avoid “bare tweets”

Oddly enough the conclusion from this case does not seem clear cut to us, but we are not lawyers. The one clear cut conclusion is to not tweet “bare tweets” which are potentially defamatory. That means (and please ask your legal advisor) that even if you did not intend your tweet to defame a person that you will still be liable if the ordinary reasonable reader understood them in that way. If your tweet stands on its own and is without summary or hyperlink and is defamatory then you may have a problem.

Beyond “bare tweets” it is a little difficult to interpret the Court’s ruling as we do not see the actual evidence tendered – the actual Tweet matters. This is a very significant gap in our understanding as the first and second Tweet matter were found to be defamatory and the third found not to be defamatory. Here is what we derive from the judgment as best we can understand.

Tweet matter 1
The first of the Twitter matters was a “tweet” which, after a line identifying The Age’s Twitter account as the author, comprised only the words “Treasurer Hockey for sale” and a truncated hyperlink appearing as “theage.com.au/federal-politi…”. Below the text of the tweet, alongside options to “Reply”, “Retweet”, and “Favorite”, was another hyperlink using the words “View Summary”.

Context: This Tweet matter is different to the two others in that it does not have a Summary. The Court ruled that Mr Hockey’s claims succeeded in relation to the second Tweet matter because of the associated summary, which was missing from the first Tweet matter. However the Court ruled that the first bare tweet by does convey the same defamatory meaning as did The SMH poster on the basis that the greater ease by which the reader may obtain access to the article in question is not a reason for concluding that all readers of the tweet will exercise that access.

Variation from Tweet matter 3: Tweet matter 1 has a hyperlink to the article and Tweet matter three was considered to not be defamatory because it would have been read in conjunction with the article. So the offending part seems to be the actual specific text of the bare tweet itself “Treasurer Hockey for sale” which in the other tweets became “Treasurer for Sale: Joe Hockey offers privileged access”. This is unless the role of a “truncated hyperlink” played a role but this was not mentioned in the judgment so presumably not.

Tweet matter 2
The second Twitter matter was described in Mr Hockey’s pleading as a tweet containing a “summary” comprising the following words: Treasurer for Sale: Joe Hockey offers privileged access Summary Treasurer Joe Hockey is granting privileged access to a select group of business leaders in return for political donations totalling hundreds of thousands of dollars each year. This text appeared alongside a photo of Mr Hockey and above another hyperlink using the words “View on web”.

Context: The Court ruled that ordinary readers reading the summary would have regarded that as corrupt conduct, despite the “View on web” being a hyperlink to The Age article which was not found to be defamatory.

Variation from Tweet matter 3: This Tweet matter had a summary which the Court found to be defamatory. It also had a hyperlink “View on Web” to the article (which separately was not found to be defamatory) but unlike in the case of Tweet matter 3 this was not deemed to be something which would be read in conjunction with the tweet. It seems that the issue is with the actually summary alone.

Tweet matter 3
The third Twitter matter was described as a “tweet and article”. As tendered, this matter was the same as the second Twitter matter described above, but in conjunction with a copy of the Nicholls article as it appeared on The Age website.

Context: The judgment stated that “initial understanding of the reader on reading the summary itself would, for the reasons just given, have been that Mr Hockey was engaging in corrupt conduct. However, when the reader read the Nicholls article, that understanding would have been dispelled”.

Variation from Tweet matters 1 & 2: This Tweet matter differs from Tweet matter one by having the same explicit bare tweet text as Tweet matter two. As far as we can determine after carefully reading the judgment the only difference between this and Tweet matter two is that it appears “in conjunction with a copy of the Nicholls article as it appeared on The Age website”. We do not know if this means that it has a different Summary – our reading it that it appears to be the same as Tweet matter two. In which case the definitive difference is whatever “in conjunction with a copy” means. And that we do not know. It would be necessary to actually view the evidence to understand the difference between Tweet matter two and three, unless we are simply missing something significant in the judgment.

Difference between the defamatory and non-defamatory tweets

The crux of the learnings from this judgment relies on knowing the precise difference between Tweet matter two and Tweet matter three.

From our research it may be that this tweet below represents Tweet matter three the non-defamatory tweet if we substitute The Age article with The SMH one shown. It seems that Tweet matter two only contained a photo of Mr Hockey and “View on web” whereas Tweet matter three contained “a copy of the article” in which it can be seen that the issue is about membership fees being paid to the North Sydney Forum and outlining levels of membership. This context lead the Court to consider that this tweet and the article would be read in conjunction and hence non-defamatory as it considered the article to be non-defamatory.

This is speculation on our part and the actual evidence needs to be viewed in order to draw conclusions. The fact that the tweet below is still active and visible whereas the offending tweets are deleted at Twitter (but still in Google cache) suggests that this format is similar to Tweet matter three.

Some description

Conclusion

So it seems to us that there are a few surprising and unorthodox matters arising from this judgment, namely:

  • How do we understand what “in conjunction with a copy” means in relation to Tweet matter three and why it differs from Tweet matter two which was found to be defamatory?
  • What determines when a tweet might be deemed to be “read in conjunction” with an article since Tweet matters one and two had hyperlinks but for them this was not deemed to be a valid defence?Could we conclude that the strength of the wording of the tweet (Tweet matter one) or the Summary (Tweet matter two) overrides the concept of reading the article “in conjunction”?
  • Since The Age was found liable for the defamatory nature of the Summary in Tweet matter two and these summaries may potentially be auto-generated by Twitter then how should we protect ourselves from this risk?

We look forward to others with specific legal knowledge to enlighten us. In the meantime do not tweet potentially defamatory tweets – always good advice.

This article originally appeared on www.which-50.com

 

Latest News

Women In Media Profile: Kirsty Bloore
  • Media

Women In Media Profile: Kirsty Bloore

Bereft of any Monday motivation? Let today's Women in Media profile be like low-current electric waves to the brain.

by B&T Magazine

B&T Magazine
Arq Group Activates New Branding By Hulsbosch  
  • Media

Arq Group Activates New Branding By Hulsbosch  

Arq Group has launched a new identity created by award-winning agency Hulsbosch, with the business rebranding from Melbourne IT to Arq. Previously known as Melbourne IT, the company was founded in 1996 as one of Melbourne University’s commercial ventures with the sole rights to manage .au domains in the early days of the Internet. Melbourne IT […]

Adshel Unveils ANZ Takeover Via PHD
  • Campaigns
  • Media

Adshel Unveils ANZ Takeover Via PHD

ANZ, in partnership with PHD and Adshel, have taken to the streets with a total take-over of the entire Adshel Live network. For one hour, between 8am and 9am on Tuesday 19 June, ANZ is inviting commuters to download the new ANZ app by showing six different ways the app can help them manage their […]

Nine Launches Big Ideas Pop-Up Store
  • Media

Nine Launches Big Ideas Pop-Up Store

Nine has today launched a new pop-up store, The Big Ideas Store by 9Powered, which will host a series of events, workshops, research studies and guest speakers that demonstrate how Nine’s integrated business works to formulate better solutions to the challenges facing marketers. Over the next two weeks, The Big Ideas Store will highlight how […]

Gillian Armstrong: Adland’s Become “Brainwashed Into Thinking All Directors Have Beards”
  • Advertising

Gillian Armstrong: Adland’s Become “Brainwashed Into Thinking All Directors Have Beards”

Acclaimed Australian director Gillian Armstrong has launched a stinging attack on agency “boys’ club” that, she believes, continue to overlook female directors for TV campaigns. Armstrong, 67, cited stats that show half of all graduate directors leaving Aussie colleges are now female, they’re regularly cleaning-up in short film competitions, however, it’s not translating to directing work within the industry. Only about […]

by B&T Magazine

B&T Magazine
Carat & Initiative Share The Spoils In WA Government’s $65 Million Media Business
  • Media

Carat & Initiative Share The Spoils In WA Government’s $65 Million Media Business

IPG’s Initiative and Dentsu’s Carat have both been awarded a slice of the West Australian government’s $65 million spend. The government account is broken into two entities – campaign and non-campaign – each with its own agency roster. Carat has retained its long-standing position on the agency panel for all campaign work, which accounts for […]

A Golden Opportunity! Lucky Numbers For Sale!
  • Marketing
  • Partner Content

A Golden Opportunity! Lucky Numbers For Sale!

In case you missed it last week, a very lucky phone number – 1800 80 80 80 – is up for sale. And it could be yours!

Partner Content

by Customer Connect

The AppNexus Marketplace Launches Guaranteed Views
  • Technology

The AppNexus Marketplace Launches Guaranteed Views

AppNexus, the world’s leading independent advertising technology company, today announced the launch of Guaranteed Views, a marketplace product that changes the way advertising is bought and sold on the open internet. Guaranteed Views enables marketers and agencies to pay only for ads that are measured as viewable and is the first programmatic product that enables 100% viewable buying at scale outside of Facebook and Google.

Dentsu Aegis Network Predicts Australian Ad Spend Growth Of 2.8%
  • Marketing

Dentsu Aegis Network Predicts Australian Ad Spend Growth Of 2.8%

• Ad spend in Australia forecast to grow by 2.8% in 2018 , with main drivers of growth in Government, Retail, Finance and Gambling sectors. • Global advertising spend to grow by 3.9%, revised up from 3.6% in January 2018. • Digital to overtake TV for the first time, to reach 38.4% of global share (TV 35.5%). In 21 out of the 59 markets tracked, digital will be the leading advertising channel in 2018. • One quarter (25.2%) of global ad spend will be delivered through mobile devices for the first time.

Pac Mags Appoints New Client Strategy Director For Victoria
  • Media

Pac Mags Appoints New Client Strategy Director For Victoria

Seven West Media’s Pacific Magazines has announced the appointment of Emma Baston as client strategy director for Victoria. Baston has worked in senior digital media buying and planning roles at various agencies including UM Australia, Cummins&Partners and MindShare, with exposure across the strategy, communications and creative process. She has also worked at Facebook in a […]

Seamless pattern of a crowd of many different people profile heads. Vector background.
  • Media

SBS Launches Diverse Communities Content Initiative

SBS has launched the Short-Form Content Initiative, a commitment to providing increased opportunities for Australian creatives from diverse communities through the commissioning and production of content for SBS On Demand. SBS has partnered with five of Australia’s screen agencies, including Film Victoria, Create NSW, Screen Queensland, Screenwest and South Australian Film Corporation. The initiative aims […]

BIG W Unveils Toy Mania Via M&C Saatchi
  • Campaigns

BIG W Unveils Toy Mania Via M&C Saatchi

BIG W, the home for families, fun and entertainment, has today launched its annual toy sale campaign – Toy Mania. Running until 11 July, the campaign showcases the frenzy and hysteria that comes with the BIG W toy sale. It also highlights that buying toys can be just as fun as playing with them and […]

Datorama Launches AI-Supported Data Visualisation Tool ‘Data Canvas’
  • Technology

Datorama Launches AI-Supported Data Visualisation Tool ‘Data Canvas’

Datorama, a global technology company, today announced the launch of Data Canvas, a suite of new data visualisation capabilities within its Marketing Intelligence platform. Datorama Data Canvas leverages the power of artificial intelligence (AI) in a brand new way — to help marketers create expert-designed dashboards to tell compelling, data-driven stories. Datorama’s previous AI releases have […]

Who’s Looking The Goods At Cannes Lions 2018
  • Opinion

Who’s Looking The Goods At Cannes Lions 2018

In this opinion, Fjord lead Bronwyn van der Merwe (pictured below) discusses the work to look out for at Cannes Lions 2018. I fully expect there will be some staggering examples of creative brilliance at Cannes Lions this year, and I’d recommend anyone going resists having their attention pulled by projects that are largely based on […]

Opinion

by B&T Magazine

B&T Magazine
We Are Social Acquires Socialize
  • Media

We Are Social Acquires Socialize

We Are Social has acquired Socialize; however, it will not be renamed We Are Socialize or even Margaret for that matter.

Global Marketing Player adm Appoints Country Manager For Australia & NZ
  • Marketing

Global Marketing Player adm Appoints Country Manager For Australia & NZ

International marketing services business adm Group Ltd has appointed Matt Cave as its country lead for Australia and New Zealand. Cave (pictured above) has more than 25 years of industry experience in the Asia-Pacific region, and will be instrumental in driving adm’s expansion throughout Australia and New Zealand. With 26 offices in 19 countries around […]

Weploy CMO Ben Eatwell: “We Want To Help Businesses Challenge The Status Quo”
  • Media
  • Technology

Weploy CMO Ben Eatwell: “We Want To Help Businesses Challenge The Status Quo”

Weploy began with a shared realisation between two friends that recruiting quality staff had become too complicated and it was high-time so declutter the process. Based in Melbourne, the start-up combines Tinder-style online skills-matching with Australian job market, and in doing so, rids eager employers of the strenuous – and at times incredibly uncomfortable – […]

Nielsen Acquires Sydney-Based Media Analysis Business Landsberry & James
  • Marketing

Nielsen Acquires Sydney-Based Media Analysis Business Landsberry & James

Nielsen has announced it has acquired Landsberry & James (L&J), a leading media analysis and software company based in Sydney, Australia. L&J designs, develops and markets software across the entire media analytics, planning, buying and post analysis process for television, digital, radio, advertising expenditure and advertising creatives. Nielsen’s investment in L&J enables an unparalleled and powerful […]

Pac Mags’ Home Beautiful Partners With Harvey Norman To Launch ‘Cooks Co-Op’
  • Marketing
  • Media

Pac Mags’ Home Beautiful Partners With Harvey Norman To Launch ‘Cooks Co-Op’

Home Beautiful and Harvey Norman have partnered on a new content series which will transform a quintessential Aussie shed into a field-to-fork restaurant whilst showcasing culinary local heroes. In 2012, Martin Boetz (pictured above, right) – the chef behind the cult following of Longrain during his 13-year stint – escaped the bustle of the big smoke […]

Music Feeds & Purple Sneakers Join Forces
  • Media

Music Feeds & Purple Sneakers Join Forces

Music Feeds and Purple Sneakers have unveiled a new strategic partnership that will allow music industry and direct advertisers to extend campaign bookings across all Purple Sneakers digital platforms when booking with Music Feeds. Founded in 2005 by Martin Novosel as a club brand and events company, Purple Sneakers is a key player in the Australian […]

by B&T Magazine

B&T Magazine
Headway & App Annie Get Ready For FIFA 2018
  • Media
  • Technology

Headway & App Annie Get Ready For FIFA 2018

Headway, the leading data-driven media buying company, has teamed up with market data and insights company AppAnnie. Together, the companies have unveiled The App Marketer’s Guide to the World Cup – a whitepaper designed to help app marketers succeed. Every year, flagship sporting events are breaking the internet with increasing viewership and the 2018 FIFA World Cup […]

Twitter Makes In-Stream Video Ads Available To All
  • Advertising
  • Media

Twitter Makes In-Stream Video Ads Available To All

Social media giant Twitter has announced it’s making in-stream video ads available to all advertisers – including self-serve – across 12 markets, including Australia. The popular video format attaches pre-roll content in front of premium publisher videos and highlights. The 12 international markets where Twitter’s in-stream ads will be available are Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, […]

Australian Alliance For Data Leadership Appoints New CEO
  • Advertising
  • Marketing

Australian Alliance For Data Leadership Appoints New CEO

The Australian Alliance for Data Leadership (AADL) has announced the appointment of credentialled senior executive Stephen Porges as its new CEO. Porges currently sits on a number of company boards, has considerable public and private sector listed company management expertise, and has been instrumental in successful data-driven businesses. He also brings CEO skills gained at […]

Business , Nicola Lewis poses for a portrait in Surry Hills. Lewis is being appointed to run WPP's GroupM in Australia and New Zealand.  
Pic Jenny Evans
  • Media

Women In Media Profile: Nicola Lewis

GroupM investment chief Nicola Lewis is grilled in latest Women in Media profile. It's more a gentle simmer, really.

by B&T Magazine

B&T Magazine