Almost Three Quarters Of Companies React To Disruption Two Years Later

Almost Three Quarters Of Companies React To Disruption Two Years Later

Disruption is happening. No point disputing that. And yet while companies are aware it’s happening, two years or more tend to pass before they react.

At least that’s the view of Kai Riemer, chair of the digital disruption research group at the University of Sydney Business School, speaking at the digital disruption conference Daze of Disruption in Sydney this morning.

Quoting research conducted in collaboration with software company Capgemini, 74 per cent of companies only react to digital disruption two years later.

“About three quarters of incumbent businesses in any industry only react to that form of disruption two years or later after it actually happens,” he said. That doesn’t mean businesses are just sitting around on their arses doing nothing though. Rather sometimes it’s hard to see who are the disrupters in the market.

Pulling the example of Apple’s iPhone, Riemer explained how no one could have predicted at the time how much of impact that small piece of tech was going to create.

Back in the day, it was considered a “bad phone”, said Riemer because it didn’t make sense. And it was largely dismissed.

“From a Nokia point of view, this is just a bad phone,” he said. “But also from a Blackberry point of view, how were you supposed to do messenger on this thing, it didn’t even have a keyboard. So a keyboard on the screen is much inferior to a physical keyboard.”

“But that was not the point,” he continued. “What this thing unleashed is a fundamental change in the way in which we view software, the way in which we communicate…it changed meetings, it changed music, it changed the way we communicated with each other.

“And that change is much more profound than just the technology.”

Disruptive technology such as the iPhone isn’t brought about by solving a problem or addressing a customer’s pain point.

When the Apple Smartwatch was suggested many wondered why they would need one when it doesn’t do anything different, explained Riemer. People asked what problem did it solve.

“That’s not the point. The point is that these things allow us to do things that haven’t been done before. They’re not about doing something better or solving the problem…they’re about inventing futures,” he said.

 




Latest News

Sydney Comedy Festival: Taking The City & Social Media By Storm
  • Media

Sydney Comedy Festival: Taking The City & Social Media By Storm

Sydney Comedy Festival 2024 is live and ready to rumble, showing the best of international and homegrown talent at a host of venues around town. As usual, it’s hot on the heels of its big sister, the giant that is the Melbourne International Comedy Festival, picking up some acts as they continue on their own […]

Global Marketers Descend For AANA’s RESET For Growth
  • Advertising

Global Marketers Descend For AANA’s RESET For Growth

The Australian Association of National Advertisers (AANA) has announced the final epic lineup of local and global marketing powerhouses for RESET for Growth 2024. Lead image: Josh Faulks, chief executive officer, AANA  Back in 2000, a woman with no business experience opened her first juice bar in Adelaide. The idea was brilliantly simple: make healthy […]