MOO Premium Foods Admits “100% Ocean Plastics” Claims Misled Consumers

MOO Premium Foods Admits “100% Ocean Plastics” Claims Misled Consumers
B&T Magazine
Edited by B&T Magazine



South Australian yoghurt manufacturer MOO Premium Foods has agreed to stop using the term “100% ocean plastics” after an investigation by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission found the company’s use of the term was misleading.

The ACCC announced today that MOO had entered into a court-enforceable undertaking to remove the false or misleading “100% ocean plastics” claims from its marketing materials and to publish corrections on its website and social media accounts for 60 days.

Last December, Ocean debris campaign organisation Tangaroa Blue, through its lawyers, the Environmental Defenders Office, complained to the ACCC that MOO and other food manufacturers were misleading in using the term “100% ocean plastics.” Decisions on the other companies’ claims are pending.

The ACCC found that since November 2021, MOO claimed its yoghurt tubs are made from “100% ocean plastic”. The watchdog was concerned this gave the impression they were made from plastic waste collected directly from the ocean when this was not the case. While MOO included disclaimers on the top and back of the packaging, the ACCC considered they were insufficient to overcome the headline representation of ‘100% ocean plastic’.

“Our investigation revealed that the plastic resin used in the manufacture of MOO’s yoghurt packaging was collected from coastal areas in Malaysia and not directly from the ocean,” said Commissioner Liza Carver.

“Many people understand the harm that plastics are doing to our marine life, and they want to make consumer choices that tackle the problem,” said Tangaroa Blue Foundation CEO Heidi Tait. “Companies must not make false or misleading statements about their products’ environmental impacts to get a competitive advantage and increase their profits”.

“While MOO did qualify its statements, the overall effect was to mislead consumers. If you need to add asterixis all over your product to explain one-line marketing claims, you are opening yourself up to greenwashing complaints”.

“We welcome the ACCC’s ruling and MOO’s undertaking to correct the record” said EDO Managing Lawyer Kirsty Ruddock. “This case should serve as a signal warning to other companies that may be considering misrepresenting the environmental impacts of their products to boost profits”.

MOO Premium Foods was contacted for a comment but did not reply.




Please login with linkedin to comment

moo premium foods

Latest News

SBS Audio Campaign Tells The Stories Of New Australians, With Multilingual Content Offerings To Assist Migrants
  • Advertising
  • Campaigns

SBS Audio Campaign Tells The Stories Of New Australians, With Multilingual Content Offerings To Assist Migrants

SBS Audio has launched a new marketing campaign for its ‘Australia Explained’ service which supports new migrants to successfully navigate life in Australia and achieve a greater sense of belonging and social cohesion. SBS’s flagship service for new migrants, Australia explained, has launched a multi-platform marketing campaign that reaches into the heart of the migrant […]

Tracker App Launches, Promising Consumers A Read On Brand’s & Products Sustainability Chops
  • Advertising

Tracker App Launches, Promising Consumers A Read On Brand’s & Products Sustainability Chops

Shoppers can now get access to sustainability information at their fingertips through Tracker, a first-of-its-kind mobile app. The Tracker app centralises sustainability data into a single, easy-to-understand format, helping shoppers make informed choices about the brands and products they support. Shoppers can simply scan the barcode of their favourite supermarket, chemist or department store item […]