B&TB&TB&T
  • Advertising
    • Campaigns of the Month
    • Effectiveness
    • League Tables
    • Opinion & Analysis
    • PR
    • Production & Craft
    • Social
    • Strategy & Insight
  • Agencies
    • Agency Scorecards
    • Appointments
    • Culture Bites
    • League Tables
    • New Business
    • Opinions & Analysis
    • Profiles
    • The Work
    • Fast 10
  • Awards
    • 30 Under 30
    • B&T Awards
    • Cairns Crocodiles Awards
    • Hatchlings
    • Women in Media
    • Women Leading Tech
  • Best of the Best
  • Brands
    • Appointments
    • Campaigns
    • Culture Bites
    • Opinions & Analysis
    • Partnerships
    • Spotlight on Sponsors
  • Campaigns
    • Campaigns of the Month
    • League Tables
    • Opinion & Analysis
    • The Work
  • CMOs
    • Appointments
    • CMO Power List
    • CMOs to Watch
    • Opinions & Analysis
  • Marketing
    • Appointments
    • Customer Experience
    • Data & Insights
    • Opinions & Analysis
    • Spotlight on Sponsorship
    • Strategy
    • Sports Marketing
  • Media
    • AI
    • Appointments
    • Audio
    • Digital
    • Headliners presented by Nine
    • News
    • News Media & Publishing
    • Opinions & Analysis
    • Out of Home
    • Platforms
    • Radio Ratings
    • Retail Media
    • Social
    • Spotlight on Sponsors
    • Streaming
    • Trading & Upfronts
    • TV Ratings
  • Technology
    • AdTech & MarTech
    • AI
    • Appointments
    • Opinions & Analysis
    • Platforms
  • Cairns Crocodiles
Search
Trending topics:
  • Featured
  • Nine
  • Cairns Crocodiles
  • Pinterest
  • Seven
  • B&T Exclusive
  • Australian Open
  • Partner content
  • Married At First Sight
  • ABC
  • Thinkerbell
  • Meta
  • Cairns Crocodiles Speaker Spotlight
  • 30 Under 30
  • Women Leading Tech
  • Special
  • AFL
  • TV Ratings
  • Radio Ratings
  • Sports Marketing

  • About
  • Contact
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Advertise
© 2025 B&T. The Misfits Media Company Pty Ltd.
Reading: Interbrand Hails Who Gives A Crap In Best Global Brands Report
Share
Subscribe
B&TB&T
Subscribe
Search
  • Advertising
    • Campaign of the Month
    • Effectiveness
    • League Tables
    • Opinion & Analysis
    • PR
    • Production & Craft
    • Social
    • Strategy & Insight
  • Agencies
    • Agency Scorecards
    • Appointments
    • Culture Bites
    • League Tables
    • New Business
    • Opinions & Analysis
    • Profiles
    • The Work
    • Fast 10
  • Awards
    • 30 Under 30
    • B&T Awards
    • Cairns Crocodiles Awards
    • Hatchlings
    • Women in Media
    • Women Leading Tech
  • Best of the Best
  • Brands
    • Appointments
    • Campaigns
    • Culture Bites
    • Opinions & Analysis
    • Partnerships
    • Spotlight on Sponsors
  • Campaigns
    • Campaigns of the Month
    • League Tables
    • Opinion & Analysis
    • The Work
  • CMOs
    • Appointments
    • CMO Power List
    • CMOs to Watch
    • Opinions & Analysis
  • Marketing
    • Appointments
    • Customer Experience
    • Data & Insights
    • Opinions & Analysis
    • Spotlight on Sponsorship
    • Strategy
    • Fast 10
    • Sports Marketing
  • Media
    • AI
    • Appointments
    • Audio
    • Digital
    • Headliners presented by Nine
    • News
    • News Media & Publishing
    • Opinions & Analysis
    • Out of Home
    • Platforms
    • Radio Ratings
    • Social
    • Spotlight on Sponsors
    • Streaming
    • Trading & Upfronts
    • TV Ratings
    • Retail Media
  • Technology
    • AdTech & MarTech
    • AI
    • Appointments
    • Opinions & Analysis
    • Platforms
  • Cairns Crocodiles
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Advertise
© 2026 B&T. The Misfits Media Company Pty Ltd.
B&T > Marketing > Interbrand Hails Who Gives A Crap In Best Global Brands Report
Marketing

Interbrand Hails Who Gives A Crap In Best Global Brands Report

Staff Writers
Published on: 11th October 2024 at 10:39 AM
Staff Writers
Share
5 Min Read
SHARE

Interbrand, publisher of the annual Best Global Brands report, has hailed Aussie loo roll brand Who Gives A Crap as a shining example of the value long-term brand building can have for a business.

“Desire is the foundation of the model on which the luxury category is built. It helps explains how and why luxury brands consistently outperform others in our ranking,” wrote Interbrand in its report.

“So, what happens when you apply the same brand rules to the otherwise mundane? Consider the Australian toilet paper brand Who Gives A Crap. In creating connection built around a strong brand, the business was able to transcend a functional need— and in doing so, built desire. People want to buy Crap toilet paper. It’s not that we spend all our time thinking about toilet paper; just enough to disrupt the model and steal market share.

“If you can do that with toilet paper, you can probably do it with anything…”

Nathan Birch, CEO of Interbrand Australia, said, “I’m delighted to see for the first time an Australian brand mentioned in the report – Who Gives a Crap – fast becoming a global brand icon.

“Brands are moving from ‘finding customers for your competencies’ to ‘building competencies around your customers’. It’s allowing brands to expand beyond traditional category boundaries and tap into new arenas of opportunity.

“Our analysis shows that for every point increase in the combined Role of Brand and Brand Strength, businesses can expect a 2.3x return on their stock price. This underscores the critical importance of the brand as a competitive moat and long-term growth driver. Australian brands need to ask themselves that investing in brand is not just about making gloriously creative TV ads and performance marketing; it’s about creating sustainable business value.”

However, it was not all good news in the report. Interbrand has been analysing and collecting the data since the turn of the millennium and its numbers reveal a “staggering missed opportunity”.

Interbrand said that while performance marketing tactics can drive short-term financial gains, a lack of investment in long-term brand strategy has left the Best Global Brands with at least $US3.5 trillion ($AU5.19 trillion) of unrealised value. For this last year, this equates to $US200 billion (nearly $AU300 billion) of lost revenue.

The cumulative value of the world’s most valuable brands has increased 3.4 times since Interbrand first published its ranking from $US988 billion to $US3.4 trillion ($AU1.47 billion to $AU5.04 trillion).

Gonzalo Brujó, Global CEO, Interbrand said: “If these brands had been treated and managed as strategic growth assets, then this table could be worth as much as $US6.9 trillion ($AU10.23 trillion). The growth we see hides a staggering missed opportunity.”

Apple remains the most valuable brand, but its brand value has dropped for the first time in over two decades — seeing a three per cent decline.

Commenting on Apple, Greg Silverman, global director of brand economics, Interbrand said: “While others rushed into AI, Apple took a more deliberate path to ensure its AI releases matched its values. This slower-moving act of leadership has put long-term trust ahead of short-term revenue gains. Following these brand moves, Apple’s stock has moved up 20 per cent YTD and we anticipate that Apple’s value will increase in the 2025 rankings.”

14 of the top 100 brands of 2024 are automotive, making up more than any other sector in the ranking. Three auto brands – Toyota (#6), Mercedes-Benz (#8) and BMW (#10) – appear in the top 10. However, not all auto brands have achieved such success. Tesla (#12) has one of this year’s largest declines in brand value (-9 per cent). Meanwhile, Kia (#86), Hyundai (#30) and Toyota (#6) achieved double-digit growth.

Ferrari (#62) captured this year’s spot as the top-rising brand, with +21 per cent brand value growth. Louis Vuitton jumped three places (#14 to #11) with Hermès (#22) and Prada (#83) two of the biggest luxury brand risers this year, seeing brand value growth of +15 per cent and +14 per cent respectively.

Nvidia (#36), Pandora (#91), Range Rover (#96), and Jordan (#99) are this year’s new entrants – and Jordan is the first personality brand to make it onto the table. Uber (#78) and LG (#97) re-enter.

Join more than 30,000 advertising industry experts
Get all the latest advertising and media news direct to your inbox from B&T.

No related posts.


TAGGED: Interbrand, who gives a crap
Share
Staff Writers
By Staff Writers
Follow:
Staff Writers represent B&T's team of award-winning reporters. Here, you'll find articles crafted with industry experience spanning over 50 years. Our team of specialists brings together a wealth of knowledge and a commitment to delivering insightful, topical, and breaking news. With a deep understanding of advertising and media, our Staff Writers are dedicated to providing industry-leading analysis and reporting, both shaping the conversation and setting the benchmark for excellence.

Latest News

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.
TV Ratings (1/4/2026): No MAFS, No Worries Seven News Wins The Night
02/04/2026
Ad Spend Down 3% YTD, But Nine’s Olympics Pushes Streaming 22.5%
02/04/2026
2degrees Rings Up Real Connection In Scroll-Stopping Campaign Via TBWA\NZ
02/04/2026
How AI Search Is Impacting Your Brand & Your Complete GEO Playbook
02/04/2026
//

B&T is Australia’s leading news publication magazine for the advertising, marketing, media and PR industries.

 

B&T is owned by parent company The Misfits Media Company Pty Ltd.

About B&T

  • About
  • Contact
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Advertise

Top Categories

  • Advertising
  • Campaigns
  • Marketing
  • Media
  • Opinions & Analysis
  • Technology

Sign Up for Our Newsletter



B&TB&T
Follow US
© 2026 B&T. The Misfits Media Company Pty Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Register Lost your password?