Trend vs Trendy: How Strategists Know When to Jump On The Bandwagon

Trend vs Trendy: How Strategists Know When to Jump On The Bandwagon

With data abound, it’s easy to tap into the latest craze, but how do we differentiate from what’s merely Trendy to what’s a true Trend? OMD’s Peita Pacey asks the question.

As strategists, our job first and foremost is to be a virtual soothsayer into a consumers world. Often asked by clients to help them identify relevant trends which they can tap into to ensure the future success and growth for their business. With data abound, we can these days tap into an extraordinary amount of information to keep us abreast of the “latest”. The latest craze, gadget, band, product or designer who is setting our consumers world alight, all in real time. It allows us to speak to our consumer in a relevant and engaging manner. But the real challenge is to be able to differentiate from what’s merely ‘trendy’ and what’s a true ‘trend’, and then applying that to our clients business.

So what is a trend anyway? According to (and they should know) “a consumer trend is a new manifestation among consumers – in behaviour, attitude, or expectation – of a fundamental human need, want or desire”.

A fad however is a more transient way in which to serve that underlying consumer need. As Bruce Cohen in Industry Voice defines it, “Fads are driven by an emotional need to purchase, based on hype and idealistic product perceptions”. It’s a quickly embraced, short-lived, enthusiastically followed behaviour of a mass population, and generally deemed ‘cool’.  They follow a typical lifecycle of insider discovery, media hysteria, and finally mainstream acceptance.

Trends have longevity and can fundamentally change the way a community works; their effects felt for years. Whereas fads can cross cultural borders with rapid uptake. Think gamification (trend) vs Pokemon (trendy). Think casualisation of formal fashion (trend) vs the platform sandal (trendy). Think binge drinking (trend) vs SubZero alcopop (revolting). Think pop music (trend and cultural shifter from the 1960s onwards) vs Justin Bieber (hopefully a short lived blight on the music landscape).

A great example which encompasses this is the phenomenon that is Tinder. The basic human need to belong, coupled with advances in technology has developed the ability to connect socially online. The trend we see is the expectation that these instant connections will spill over into our offline lives. Facebook was the first articulation of this which has then evolved into Tinder; a perfect example of a fad which allows this trend to be a part of our daily lives. What will come after Tinder we are yet to see but the one guarantee is that the basic human need to connect will continue as long as we do.

Another great example of a trend is peer to peer consumerism. Driven again by technology, and our basic human need for discovery and community, we see the success of businesses such as Kickstarter and Air BnB. If you think about it, the Trading Post was an early incarnation of this type of consumerism.

People often refer to Hipsters or Emos as being a trend. But for me, they are a fad based articulation of the trend of identification through individualisation, driven by the basic human desires for acceptance and community. Because afterall, we’ll still want to fit in once we get sick of the beards. Same way we did with tattoos and piercings back in the ’90s and noughties.

The question we should really be asking is how should trends be considered when it comes to a brand’s identity? Because really, authenticity (the key to success for any brand these days) comes from using a trend only when it fits in with a brands DNA. If a brand puts caring and wellbeing at the core of its DNA, then it would make sense to see how it could use the trend of connected objects within NPD strategy. Or if a brand puts innovation at its heart, why not tap into the trend of Pretail with the consumer desire to shop for products and services at concept stage?

So the next time your client asks you to find the next Loomband opportunity, try to identify what the real trend is that they could tap into to place their brand in the heart of your consumer, because no one really wants their legacy to be Justin Bieber.

Peita Pacey is a strategy director at OMD

Please login with linkedin to comment

Kontented Mad Men New York Magazine Wicked Musical

Latest News

Creating Efficiencies in the Age of Consumer Privacy
  • Marketing

Creating Efficiencies in the Age of Consumer Privacy

In this opinion piece, Jess Miles, Country Manager ANZ of Integral Ad Science, reflects on the questions surrounding consumer data. The ability to collect consumer data online has revolutionised digital advertising by enabling customised targeting strategies and data collection. This reliance on data has been the cornerstone of many audience targeted strategies enabling marketers to […]


by Kathleen Farmilo

Kathleen Farmilo
Jye Smith Named President Of Vibewire Board
  • Media

Jye Smith Named President Of Vibewire Board

After ten years of board leadership of the young entrepreneurial collective Vibewire, Founder & Co-CEO of Disruptors Co. Gavin Heaton is passing the torch to fellow strategy and creative leader Jye Smith, Founder and Director of branding and design studio DOUBLESTAR CO, who will now take over as Board President.

Australian CDP Lexer Raises $33.5M In Funding
  • Technology

Australian CDP Lexer Raises $33.5M In Funding

Lexer, the Customer Data Platform for brands and retailers, today announced it has raised AU$33.5 million in Series B funding, bringing its total funding to AU$43 million. The round was led by Blackbird Ventures and King River Capital, with Series A investor January Capital also participating. Blackbird’s Rick Baker will join the Lexer board. The […]