The results of a Bastion survey commissioned by B&T reveal that Australia is starkly divided on the issue of becoming a republic, underscoring the deep and complex perspectives held across the country on this question of national identity. With opinions polarized between those calling for a complete break from the British monarchy and those who wish to maintain the connection, the debate is likely to be contentious for years to come.
The survey, which captured responses from 270 Australians, highlights just how evenly split the nation is on the issue of a republic. When asked if Australia should hold a referendum within the next five years on becoming a republic, 40 per cent answered yes, while 42.22 per cent opposed the idea, and 17.78 per cent were unsure. This nearly equal divide encapsulates the complexities of a debate that touches on tradition, sovereignty, and the very nature of Australian identity.
The survey sample was well-rounded, including participants from a variety of regions and age groups. Most respondents were female (55.19 per cent), with males making up 44.81 per cent. Age-wise, the majority were between 40 and 59, covering a demographic likely to have experienced various cultural and political shifts in Australia over recent decades. Regional representation spanned across the country, with the highest concentrations in Sydney (19.26 per cent), Brisbane (13.33 per cent), and the ACT (15.93 per cent). This diverse base of respondents provided insights that span urban and regional perspectives, age groups, and varying levels of attachment to Australia’s British ties.
The Argument for Change: Pro-Republic Voices
For many Australians, the push toward a republic represents a desire for national independence and a departure from our colonial legacy. Nearly half of the respondents (46.3 per cent) indicated that if a referendum were held today, they would vote in favour of becoming a republic.
Independence and Identity: There’s a strong desire among republic supporters for Australia to be fully independent, with a head of state that reflects Australian identity, not British heritage. When asked why they would support the move to a republic one respondent said: “Australia should stand as its own entity, unburdened from monarchical ties”. Another replied: “It’s time for Australia to symbolise its unique identity”.
Modern Relevance: Many pro-republic Australians see the monarchy as outdated, with respondents feeling that a republic would better reflect Australia’s contemporary values as a diverse, multicultural nation. For these individuals, the monarchy is seen as an institution of the past, with one participant summarising, in no uncertain terms, “the British monarchy is an outdated, behind-the-times embarrassment.”
Addressing Colonial History: Some believe that moving away from the monarchy could be a step toward reconciling with Australia’s colonial past, particularly in relation to harm committed against Indigenous Australians. “We should be pledging allegiance to Australia, not England’s King,” one respondent said, revealing a desire to address historical wrongs and embrace a more inclusive national identity. “It is an insult to the Indigenous people of Australia to have a monarch as its head of state. For a land that was never ceded and for the years of harm that British invasion has caused, Australia deserves a republic,” another replied.
Momentum for Change: For a portion of the respondents, the push for a republic is simply about moving forward. Statements like “It’s time to move on” and “About time” reflect a growing impatience with the monarchy, with many supporters ready to embrace a republic without requiring exhaustive details of the proposed system.
The Case for Continuity: Monarchist Perspectives
On the other hand, a significant portion of respondents remain deeply committed to the monarchy. While 46.3 per cent indicated support for a republic, 35.19 per cent would vote against it, underscoring a sizable bloc that views the monarchy as an essential part of Australia’s heritage and stability.
Value of Tradition and Stability: For monarchist supporters, the monarchy represents continuity and a connection to Australia’s historical roots. Many believe that the monarchy isn’t “broken” and therefore doesn’t need fixing. Statements like “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” and “I like and respect the traditions that are in place” capture a sense of contentment with the status quo.
Concerns About the Unknown: Some respondents worry about what a shift to a republic would entail, expressing fears over the potential financial costs, political disruption, and risks of an untested system. Many mentioned the perceived stability of constitutional monarchy as a safeguard against political upheaval, with one respondent referencing concerns about “ending up with a system that doesn’t work as well.”
Commonwealth Benefits: For others, the Commonwealth connection is viewed as advantageous, fostering diplomatic ties and cultural unity across nations. Respondents expressed appreciation for Australia’s role within the Commonwealth, with one stating, “Being tied to the British crown gives us a lot of protection.”
Indecision and Demand for Clarity
While many Australians are firmly for or against a republic, a considerable segment remains uncertain. Approximately 18.52 per cent of respondents were undecided about how they would vote in a referendum, indicating a need for more information and a clearer vision of what a republic would look like. This ambivalence reflects concerns about the lack of concrete details about how a republic might alter Australia’s governance and political structure. Many in this group are open to change but hesitant without knowing the full implications.
One of the more divisive questions posed was whether becoming a republic would strengthen Australians’ connection to national identity. Responses to this question were mixed: 18.89 per cent strongly agreed that a republic would make them feel more connected to Australia, while 22.59 per cent strongly disagreed. A significant portion, 25.19 per cent, remained neutral, revealing that while the idea of a republic resonates with some Australians, others continue to find symbolic value in their connection to the British crown.
Public Preference for a Head of State
For those supporting a republic, the question of who would serve as Australia’s head of state is pivotal. 64 per cent of respondents indicated a preference for a head of state elected directly by the people. This preference reflects a desire for an inclusive, democratic approach to leadership that resonates with the modern Australian ethos. Meanwhile, other respondents favoured alternatives, such as a government-appointed figure based on merit, suggesting a diversity of opinions even within the pro-republic camp.
The Monarchy’s Influence: Political or Symbolic?
An overwhelming majority of Australians feel that the British monarchy has little to no direct influence on Australian politics today. With 63.33 per cent believing the monarchy’s role is largely symbolic, many see the debate as being more about identity and tradition than practical governance. Only a small fraction (9.26 per cent) felt the monarchy still exerts significant influence, highlighting a widespread perception that the monarchy’s influence has waned over time.
Mixed Impact of Brand Positioning
The survey also explored whether a brand’s stance on the republic vs. monarchy debate would influence purchasing decisions. A strong majority, 61.85 per cent, said a brand’s position would not impact their buying choices, indicating that Australians primarily view the debate as a political issue separate from consumer behaviour. Only 19.63 per cent stated they would stop supporting a brand if its stance differed from their own.
The Bastion survey reveals Australia is caught between two visions of its future. While nearly half the population is ready to embrace a republic, a significant portion values the monarchy’s tradition and stability. For many, the question is not just whether to break away from the British crown but also what a new Australian identity would look like.
This divide suggests that any future referendum on the republic will not be an easy decision for Australians. The path forward requires not only a clear, cohesive plan for a republic but also an understanding of the emotional and historical ties that bind Australians to the monarchy.
The outcome of this debate could reshape Australia’s identity for generations to come, and the country seems evenly poised at a crossroads between tradition and independence.
