B&TB&TB&T
  • Advertising
    • Campaigns of the Month
    • Effectiveness
    • League Tables
    • Opinion & Analysis
    • PR
    • Production & Craft
    • Social
    • Strategy & Insight
  • Agencies
    • Agency Scorecards
    • Appointments
    • Culture Bites
    • League Tables
    • New Business
    • Opinions & Analysis
    • Profiles
    • The Work
    • Fast 10
  • Awards
    • 30 Under 30
    • B&T Awards
    • Cairns Crocodiles Awards
    • Hatchlings
    • Women in Media
    • Women Leading Tech
  • Best of the Best
  • Brands
    • Appointments
    • Campaigns
    • Culture Bites
    • Opinions & Analysis
    • Partnerships
    • Spotlight on Sponsors
  • Campaigns
    • Campaigns of the Month
    • League Tables
    • Opinion & Analysis
    • The Work
  • CMOs
    • Appointments
    • CMO Power List
    • CMOs to Watch
    • Opinions & Analysis
  • Marketing
    • Appointments
    • Customer Experience
    • Data & Insights
    • Opinions & Analysis
    • Spotlight on Sponsorship
    • Strategy
    • Sports Marketing
  • Media
    • AI
    • Appointments
    • Audio
    • Digital
    • Headliners presented by Nine
    • News
    • News Media & Publishing
    • Opinions & Analysis
    • Out of Home
    • Platforms
    • Radio Ratings
    • Retail Media
    • Social
    • Spotlight on Sponsors
    • Streaming
    • Trading & Upfronts
    • TV Ratings
  • Technology
    • AdTech & MarTech
    • AI
    • Appointments
    • Opinions & Analysis
    • Platforms
  • Cairns Crocodiles
Search
Trending topics:
  • Featured
  • Nine
  • Cairns Crocodiles
  • Pinterest
  • Seven
  • B&T Exclusive
  • Australian Open
  • Married At First Sight
  • Partner content
  • ABC
  • Thinkerbell
  • Meta
  • Cairns Crocodiles Speaker Spotlight
  • 30 Under 30
  • Women Leading Tech
  • Special
  • AFL
  • TV Ratings
  • Radio Ratings
  • Sports Marketing

  • About
  • Contact
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Advertise
© 2025 B&T. The Misfits Media Company Pty Ltd.
Reading: Federal Court Busts Nurofen For Misleading Specific Pain Claims
Share
Subscribe
B&TB&T
Subscribe
Search
  • Advertising
    • Campaign of the Month
    • Effectiveness
    • League Tables
    • Opinion & Analysis
    • PR
    • Production & Craft
    • Social
    • Strategy & Insight
  • Agencies
    • Agency Scorecards
    • Appointments
    • Culture Bites
    • League Tables
    • New Business
    • Opinions & Analysis
    • Profiles
    • The Work
    • Fast 10
  • Awards
    • 30 Under 30
    • B&T Awards
    • Cairns Crocodiles Awards
    • Hatchlings
    • Women in Media
    • Women Leading Tech
  • Best of the Best
  • Brands
    • Appointments
    • Campaigns
    • Culture Bites
    • Opinions & Analysis
    • Partnerships
    • Spotlight on Sponsors
  • Campaigns
    • Campaigns of the Month
    • League Tables
    • Opinion & Analysis
    • The Work
  • CMOs
    • Appointments
    • CMO Power List
    • CMOs to Watch
    • Opinions & Analysis
  • Marketing
    • Appointments
    • Customer Experience
    • Data & Insights
    • Opinions & Analysis
    • Spotlight on Sponsorship
    • Strategy
    • Fast 10
    • Sports Marketing
  • Media
    • AI
    • Appointments
    • Audio
    • Digital
    • Headliners presented by Nine
    • News
    • News Media & Publishing
    • Opinions & Analysis
    • Out of Home
    • Platforms
    • Radio Ratings
    • Social
    • Spotlight on Sponsors
    • Streaming
    • Trading & Upfronts
    • TV Ratings
    • Retail Media
  • Technology
    • AdTech & MarTech
    • AI
    • Appointments
    • Opinions & Analysis
    • Platforms
  • Cairns Crocodiles
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Advertise
© 2026 B&T. The Misfits Media Company Pty Ltd.
B&T > Advertising > Federal Court Busts Nurofen For Misleading Specific Pain Claims
Advertising

Federal Court Busts Nurofen For Misleading Specific Pain Claims

Staff Writers
Published on: 14th December 2015 at 9:34 AM
Staff Writers
Share
3 Min Read
SHARE

A Federal Court has found that Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Ltd, the company behind Nurofen, has engaged in misleading conduct by claiming Nurofen Specific Pain products are each formulated to treat a specific type of pain, when the products are identical.

The Nurofen specific products, including Nurofen Back Pain, Nurofen Period Pain, Nurofen Migraine Pain and Nurofen Tension Headache, had misleading packaging claiming each product was formulated to treat a particular type of pain and solely or specifically treated a particular type of pain.

In fact, each product contains the same active ingredient (ibuprofen lysine 342mg) and is no more effective at treating the type of pain described on its packaging than any of the other Nurofen Specific Pain products.

ACCC Chairman Rod Sims said: “The ACCC took these proceedings because it was concerned that consumers may have purchased these products in the belief that they specifically treated a certain type of pain, based on the representations on the packaging, when this was not the case.

“Truth in advertising and consumer issues in the health and medical sectors are priority areas for the ACCC, to ensure that consumers are given accurate information when making their purchasing decisions. Any representations which are difficult for a consumer to test will face greater scrutiny from the ACCC.

“The retail price of the Nurofen Specific Pain Products was significantly higher than that of other comparable analgesic products which also act as general pain relievers. Price sampling conducted by the ACCC before the proceedings were commenced indicated that the  Nurofen Specific Pain products were being sold at retail prices almost double that of Nurofen’s standard ibuprofen products and the general pain relief products of its competitors.”

The Court ordered that Reckitt Benckiser remove the Nurofen Specific Pain products from retail shelves within three months. The court has also ordered that Reckitt Benckiser publish website and newspaper corrective notices, implement a consumer protection compliance program, and pay the ACCC’s costs.

The ACCC has agreed an interim packaging arrangement with Reckitt Benckiser for use following the removal of these products. This will clearly disclose to consumers that the products are equally effective for other forms of pain.

A hearing on penalty will be held on a date to be fixed by the Court.

Join more than 30,000 advertising industry experts
Get all the latest advertising and media news direct to your inbox from B&T.

No related posts.


TAGGED: glamour magazine, youtube's creative agency leaderboard
Share
Staff Writers
By Staff Writers
Follow:
Staff Writers represent B&T's team of award-winning reporters. Here, you'll find articles crafted with industry experience spanning over 50 years. Our team of specialists brings together a wealth of knowledge and a commitment to delivering insightful, topical, and breaking news. With a deep understanding of advertising and media, our Staff Writers are dedicated to providing industry-leading analysis and reporting, both shaping the conversation and setting the benchmark for excellence.

Latest News

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.
TV Ratings (1/4/2026): No MAFS, No Worries Seven News Wins The Night
02/04/2026
Ad Spend Down 3% YTD, But Nine’s Olympics Pushes Streaming 22.5%
02/04/2026
2degrees Rings Up Real Connection In Scroll-Stopping Campaign Via TBWA\NZ
02/04/2026
How AI Search Is Impacting Your Brand & Your Complete GEO Playbook
02/04/2026
//

B&T is Australia’s leading news publication magazine for the advertising, marketing, media and PR industries.

 

B&T is owned by parent company The Misfits Media Company Pty Ltd.

About B&T

  • About
  • Contact
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Advertise

Top Categories

  • Advertising
  • Campaigns
  • Marketing
  • Media
  • Opinions & Analysis
  • Technology

Sign Up for Our Newsletter



B&TB&T
Follow US
© 2026 B&T. The Misfits Media Company Pty Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Register Lost your password?