Study: Only A Quarter Of Defamation Cases In Australia Involve Media Companies

Study: Only A Quarter Of Defamation Cases In Australia Involve Media Companies
SHARE
THIS



Private individuals rather than public figures have emerged as the primary source of defamation in the digital age, a study by the Centre for Media Transition at the University of Technology Sydney (UTS) shows.

Over a five-year period between 2013 to 2017 just over one in five (21 per cent) of plaintiffs in defamation case judgements were public figures – and just over a quarter of defendants (25.9 per cent) were media companies.

The findings contradict common assumptions about public figures being the main users of defamation laws.

They show it is more common for private individuals to be the plaintiffs in defamation actions. Private individuals are also more likely to be the defendants (sometimes with their employers).

It also confirms that NSW is the defamation capital of Australia, with more matters reaching a substantive decision than the rest of the country combined.

In addition to the five-year snapshot, the study also looked at 2007 as a “pre-social” comparison.

“The proportion of digital cases – arising from publication in social media, websites, email and messaging – has increased substantially, from just over 17 per cent in 2007 to more than 53 per cent in 2017,” said co-director of the centre for media aransition Professor Derek Wilding.

“The landscape for legal disputes around reputation is changing, as the question ‘who is a publisher’ continues to evolve.”

The study identified 189 core cases, and in total it located 609 decisions related to these cases, and another 322 cases that were still running from earlier years or just starting out. The study captures information on defamation matters over this period, but the full picture on defamation is likely to involve even more litigation activity.

“As the law evolves, we see publishers – whether big or small – caught up in many protracted disputes,” Professor Wilding said. “This chain of litigation requires a major commitment of time and resources from plaintiffs and publishers alike.”

The Centre for Media Transition, a joint venture between UTS Law and the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, has been set up to examine new business models for journalism, best practice in journalism and the legal and legislative restrictions that affect journalism, civil debate and the public’s right to know.

Professor Wilding said the study highlighted the growing influence of social platforms and websites not affiliated with media companies as the source of legal disputes.

The study showed a wide variation in the form of digital publication:

  • There were 16 cases involving Facebook posts, 20 involving emails, four involving tweets and two involving text messages
  • There were 37 cases involving websites not affiliated with media organisations, Facebook or Twitter
  • There were three cases (all relating to search results) in which Google was the defendant.

Professor Peter Fray, co-director of the centre and a former news editor, executive and journalist said, “This study prompts us to think about the conditions for free expression in this country.

“Developments in technology and user expectations provide many of us with the opportunity to publish our views. There must be a role for public policy in moving us away from costly and time-consuming legal disputes.”

The report, Trends in digital defamation, is available for download here. The independent study was in part funded by News Corporation.

 

Please login with linkedin to comment

defamation the University of Technology Sydney

Latest News

Klarna Launches Carbon Footprint Insights For 90 Million Customers
  • Marketing

Klarna Launches Carbon Footprint Insights For 90 Million Customers

Klarna has announced the launch of CO2 insights for all shopping purchases as part of its one per cent pledge, involving the donation of $10 million to initiatives supporting planet health. The new feature aims to democratise access to unbiased climate impact information for consumers at no cost or judgement, as a first step to […]

Will AR Get Rid Of Shop Changerooms?
  • Technology

Will AR Get Rid Of Shop Changerooms?

Could AR be the new way of trying on clothes? It would certainly beat dodgy changerooms with broken locks.

by B&T Magazine

B&T Magazine
Purpose, Or Is It Porpoise?
  • Opinion

Purpose, Or Is It Porpoise?

In his latest guest post, B&T regular Robert Strohfeldt skewers marketers’ latest buzzword – purpose… I used to flick through the various newspapers cartoons each day – reckon it would be tough trying to create a cartoon each day, based on a major news story, that is both funny and insightful. Since the PC mob […]

Opinion

by B&T Magazine

B&T Magazine
MILO Cereal Launches ‘Beast Mode’ Campaign Via Connecting Plots
  • Campaigns

MILO Cereal Launches ‘Beast Mode’ Campaign Via Connecting Plots

MILO Cereal has launched its first major marketing campaign for its newly launched Protein cereal, via independent creative communications agency Connecting Plots. Building on MILO’s brand message of fuelling active kids, the new campaign platform, ‘Beast Mode – Activated’, evolves the master brand’s focus on team sports. This aims to celebrate how MILO Protein helps […]