B&TB&TB&T
  • Advertising
  • Campaigns
  • Marketing
  • Media
  • Technology
  • Regulars
    • Agency Scorecards
    • Best of the Best
    • Campaigns of the Month
    • CMO Power List
    • CMOs to Watch
    • Culture Bites
    • Fast 10
    • New Business Winners
    • Spotlight on Sponsors
  • Jobs
  • Awards
    • 30 Under 30
    • B&T Awards
    • Cairns Crocodiles
    • Women In Media
    • Women Leading Tech
Search
Trending topics:
  • Cairns Crocodiles
  • Nine
  • Seven
  • AFL
  • Federal Election
  • Pinterest
  • AI
  • NRL
  • News Corp
  • Cairns Hatchlings
  • Married At First Sight
  • Channel 10
  • oOh!Media
  • Anthony Albanese
  • WPP
  • Thinkerbell
  • ARN
  • TV Ratings
  • Radio Ratings
  • Sports Marketing

  • About
  • Contact
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Advertise
© 2025 B&T. The Misfits Media Company Pty Ltd.
Reading: Racy Etto Hand Cleaner Ads Banned Over Nudity & Bestiality
Share
B&TB&T
Subscribe
Search
  • Advertising
  • Campaigns
  • Marketing
  • Media
  • Technology
  • Regulars
    • Agency Scorecards
    • Best of the Best
    • Campaigns of the Month
    • CMO Power List
    • CMOs to Watch
    • Culture Bites
    • Fast 10
    • New Business Winners
    • Spotlight on Sponsors
  • Jobs
  • Awards
    • 30 Under 30
    • B&T Awards
    • Cairns Crocodiles
    • Women In Media
    • Women Leading Tech
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Advertise
© 2025 B&T. The Misfits Media Company Pty Ltd.
B&T > Advertising > Racy Etto Hand Cleaner Ads Banned Over Nudity & Bestiality
Advertising

Racy Etto Hand Cleaner Ads Banned Over Nudity & Bestiality

Tom Fogden
Published on: 5th June 2023 at 10:10 AM
Tom Fogden
Share
4 Min Read
SHARE

Australian cosmetics brand Etto has had two of its adverts banned following concerns around their sexual content and nature.

Ad Standards found that the ads, spruiking the company’s Pure Oil Spray hand cleaner, breached section 2.2 and 2.4 of the Australian Association of National Advertisers’ code of conduct.

The above advert breached section 2.2, saying the ad employed sexual appeal “in a manner which is exploitative or degrading.”

The complaints about the ad said that it is “oppressive” and it “conjures thoughts of pornography and bestiality. The image harks back to the 1970s and earlier. Has there been no progression in the advertising industry on the portrayal of women.”

Another complaint said that:

“In the context of the tagline, and that the product is to relieve pain, the clear implication of the image is that the Aboriginal woman is being sexually assaulted by a crocodile. I’m unclear as to whether they think this is amusing but no matter, I find it incredibly offensive that this company thinks sexual assault is a fun way to promote their product. That the woman is Aboriginal is icing on the cake. Aboriginal people are greatly
underrepresented in mainstream media so to see one used in this way is disgusting.”

Etto, meanwhile, maintained that the ad was not only tasteful but that the complaints themselves were offensive in nature.

“Our tagline ‘Australia can be a dangerous place’ and the use of a crocodile pool toy was used in the manner of self-deprecating humour.

We find some of the complaints about the model in the ad, Billie, are quite offensive. Here is a beautiful, Australian woman and some of the complaints are suggesting we shouldn’t have used her because she is indigenous.

“Billie, as a consenting adult, gave her permission to use these photographs and also loves these images herself. They are in no way exploitative. We don’t believe the image is degrading. As a company led by women, we find the image celebratory of natural female beauty.”

However, Ad Standards found that the ad did breach Section 2.2 of the Code.

The second ad, below, broke Section 2.4 of the Code after not treating sex, sexuality and nudity with sensitivity.

A complaint about the ads said the viewer objected to “seeing young people in sexually provocative situations to sell a product.”

However, Etto said it did not believe the photo to be “sexual in nature,” that “no private parts of their bodies are visible,” the models were “both wearing underwear (similar to swimwear worn at a public beach)” and are even in a relationship.

“We see in this image a protectiveness by the male, empowerment of the woman and an element of tenderness and trust. We fail to see how the female and male forms in their natural state, modestly and thoughtfully covered, need to be seen as sexual, provocative, or pornographic. Is Botticelli’s Birth of Venus offensive? Or just a beautiful description of the female body? Is the statue of David offensive? Or an admired depiction of the male body? We had one reader who saw the ad and likened it to a depiction of Adam and Eve,” the company added.

Ad Standards’ panel disagreed and said that the ad did contain sexuality, nudity and was largely inappropriate.

Etto accepted both determinations and discontinued the ads in The Good Weekend magazine, though both are still visible on social media.

Join more than 30,000 advertising industry experts
Get all the latest advertising and media news direct to your inbox from B&T.

No related posts.

Share
Tom Fogden
By Tom Fogden
Follow:
Tom is B&T's editor and covers everything that helps brands connect with customers and the agencies and brands behind the work. He'll also take any opportunity to grab a mic and get in front of the camera. Before joining B&T, Tom spent many long years in dreary London covering technology for Which? and Tech.co, the automotive industry for Auto Futures and occasionally moonlighting as a music journalist for Notion and Euphoria.

Latest News

OMD’s DJ Sometimes Wholesome Wins Inaugural Club Unltd. Final
23/05/2025
TV Ratings (22/05/2025): Top Of The Table Dogs Toppled By The Dolphins In Treacherous Conditions
23/05/2025
Toothpaste Brand White Glo Admonished Over ‘Make The White Choice’ Ad
23/05/2025
Nine Hires Boomtown’s Brian Gallagher Amid Plans To Spin Off Radio Arm 
23/05/2025
//

B&T is Australia’s leading news publication magazine for the advertising, marketing, media and PR industries.

 

B&T is owned by parent company The Misfits Media Company Pty Ltd.

About B&T

  • About
  • Contact
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Advertise

Top Categories

  • Advertising
  • Campaigns
  • Marketing
  • Media
  • Opinion
  • Technology
  • TV Ratings

Sign Up for Our Newsletter



B&TB&T
Follow US
© 2025 B&T. The Misfits Media Company Pty Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Register Lost your password?