B&TB&TB&T
  • Advertising
  • Campaigns
  • Marketing
  • Media
  • Technology
  • Regulars
    • Agency Scorecards
    • Best of the Best
    • Campaigns of the Month
    • CMO Power List
    • CMOs to Watch
    • Culture Bites
    • Fast 10
    • New Business Winners
    • Spotlight on Sponsors
  • Jobs
  • Awards
    • 30 Under 30
    • B&T Awards
    • Cairns Crocodiles
    • Women In Media
    • Women Leading Tech
Search
Trending topics:
  • Cairns Crocodiles
  • Nine
  • Seven
  • Pinterest
  • WPP
  • AFL
  • Anthony Albanese
  • Thinkerbell
  • NRL
  • Federal Election
  • Cannes Lions
  • State of Origin
  • AI
  • B&T Women in Media
  • Spotlight on Sponsors
  • Channel 10
  • ARN
  • TV Ratings
  • Radio Ratings
  • Sports Marketing

  • About
  • Contact
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Advertise
© 2025 B&T. The Misfits Media Company Pty Ltd.
Reading: “Unethically Manipulated”: Backlash Continues From Controversial North Face Campaign
Share
B&TB&T
Subscribe
Search
  • Advertising
  • Campaigns
  • Marketing
  • Media
  • Technology
  • Regulars
    • Agency Scorecards
    • Best of the Best
    • Campaigns of the Month
    • CMO Power List
    • CMOs to Watch
    • Culture Bites
    • Fast 10
    • New Business Winners
    • Spotlight on Sponsors
  • Jobs
  • Awards
    • 30 Under 30
    • B&T Awards
    • Cairns Crocodiles
    • Women In Media
    • Women Leading Tech
Follow US
  • About
  • Contact
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Advertise
© 2025 B&T. The Misfits Media Company Pty Ltd.
B&T > Campaigns > “Unethically Manipulated”: Backlash Continues From Controversial North Face Campaign
Campaigns

“Unethically Manipulated”: Backlash Continues From Controversial North Face Campaign

Staff Writers
Published on: 5th June 2019 at 11:46 AM
Staff Writers
Share
3 Min Read
SHARE

Even after the outdoor apparel brand removed a controversial campaign in which it bragged about ‘gaming’ Wikipedia; many are still not happy with The North Face.

It was a failed attempt in garnering free product placement that saw The North Face land itself in some trouble.

The company replaced images on high-traffic Wikipedia pages of popular tourist destinations with images featuring its products in an effort to place its images at the top of Google searches.

What’s more, it made a video detailing its efforts and gloating the campaign had cost it “absolutely nothing just by collaborating with Wikipedia”.

The North Face quickly backed down when it realised the mess it had made and removed the campaign, but the backlash has continued.

Updating Wikipedia pages with false or misleading information is nothing new.

In fact, it has become somewhat of a practical joke on the web – which is perhaps why The North Face thought the stunt would be well-received.

But it seems the joke is on The North Face.

Social media has been quick to point out that Wikipedia is run by volunteers, meaning the people that had to edit and replace The North Face’s attempted product placement images were not being paid.

Wikimedia (parent company of Wikipedia) fellow Liam Wyatt had this to say.

For the price of paying @LeoBurnett for this campaign, @thenorthface could have bought volunteer @Wikipedia editors cameras & hiking gear and we'd have sung their praises! As it is, we're cropping the ads from the pics and reported them for breach of ToU https://t.co/XFODUri5sF https://t.co/WTjzxMiPkk

— Liam Wyatt (@Wittylama) May 28, 2019

Wyatt also publicly reached out to Patagonia – The North Face’s rival – to ask “would you be interested in sharing some photography of beautiful and remote places around the world, to be used on Wikipedia articles? We’d love to collaborate with groups that share our passion for knowledge about our planet.”

After stating The North Face had “unethically manipulated” Wikipedia with the “short-lived marketing stunt”, Wikimedia has called on companies to learn the existing best practices of properly engaging on Wikipedia.

Leo Burnett Tailor Made, the agency responsible for the disastrous campaign, has issued its own statement on the matter.

“We’re always looking for creative ways to meet consumers where they are,” it said.

“We’ve since learned that this effort worked counter to Wikipedia’s community guidelines.”

Join more than 30,000 advertising industry experts
Get all the latest advertising and media news direct to your inbox from B&T.

No related posts.

TAGGED: Patagonia, The NOrth Face, wikipedia
Share
Staff Writers
By Staff Writers
Follow:
Staff Writers represent B&T's team of award-winning reporters. Here, you'll find articles crafted with industry experience spanning over 50 years. Our team of specialists brings together a wealth of knowledge and a commitment to delivering insightful, topical, and breaking news. With a deep understanding of advertising and media, our Staff Writers are dedicated to providing industry-leading analysis and reporting, both shaping the conversation and setting the benchmark for excellence.

Latest News

Westpac Banks On Michelle Klein To Lead Marketing & Growth
23/06/2025
Diversity Council Australia Celebrate Its 40th Birthday With New Brand Identity
23/06/2025
The B&T Awards Are Back!
23/06/2025
Cannes Lions Investigating Grand Prix Win Amid Claims Of Manipulated Submission
23/06/2025
//

B&T is Australia’s leading news publication magazine for the advertising, marketing, media and PR industries.

 

B&T is owned by parent company The Misfits Media Company Pty Ltd.

About B&T

  • About
  • Contact
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Advertise

Top Categories

  • Advertising
  • Campaigns
  • Marketing
  • Media
  • Opinion
  • Technology
  • TV Ratings

Sign Up for Our Newsletter



B&TB&T
Follow US
© 2025 B&T. The Misfits Media Company Pty Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Register Lost your password?