Attribution, Net Promoter Scores And Other Fairytales!
In his final column for 2019, B&T’s occasionally difficult columnist, Robert Strohfeldt, delves into the murky marketing world of attribution and net promoter scores. And, if you can hang in until the end, there’s even a fantastic prize up for grabs, too…
Much has been said and written about attribution. So much, that the original meaning of attribution has become foggy:
An attribution identifies a source or cause of something — Attribution often involves identifying the author or source of written material or a work of art. (Somewhat different to its use in advertising: first or last click?)
ROI has always been an issue, with one of the first quotations on return on advertising by John Wanamaker (1838 to 1922) stating:
“Half the money I spend on advertising is wasted; the trouble is I don’t know which half”.
This is far from any accurate assessment on the per cent return – he simply states half his advertising “works”, but what does that mean?
I recently read an article the other day on attribution – “From Mobile Based Attribution to People-Based Innovation”.
The major issue/problem – the attribution was a measurement of “devices”, not people. One person may be counted several times due to multi-screen usage. And different teams, in those silos (I can remember when a silo was something in which grain was stored) are different people looking at different KPIs
A nifty little diagram was provided to help “illustrate” the point.
People based Attribution supposedly addresses the problem of one customer having “dozens” of fragmented anonymous profiles i.e.
There is one glaring problem with these diagrams and deductions. All communications are online. In real life, a person may have seen a website, spoken to a friend who recommended the product and service and then saw a TV ad. (Or any “traditional” advertising). This is just one alternative, there are so many more.
The latest figure I have been able to obtain has online retail purchases making up nine per cent of sales in Australia. So, these attribution studies account for less than 10 per cent of total retail purchases. (Or less as online purchases are often influenced by factors that are not online).
The use of online for research/price comparison/location etc. would occur in most purchases. But confining the attribution to online communications and purchases, excludes around 90% of purchases. (Or, more bluntly, totally useless).
Also consider that many purely online businesses advertise on TV. It is a fairly general, but accurate assumption, that once an online business becomes “successful”, they advertise on TV.
TV is mentioned, sort or i.e.
“Additionally, some non-digital channels, such as in traditional TV advertising, simply do not offer a deterministic identifier in the first place. When no deterministic identifier is available, probabilistic matching comes in as a fallback method. As the name suggests, device matching is performed by building statistical models using a combination of selected parameters and machine learning.”
So, although 90 per cent plus of purchases are done in-store, rendering the digital attribution model irrelevant, TV still the single most effective advertising medium, is treated like an “addendum” to the study.
The paper goes into detail on mobile web ad spending versus laptop/desktop web ad spending, the benefits of apps over websites (app vs. the web), the differences between 1st party and 3rd party cookies, web attribution flow, last touch and multi touch, without any reference to the all-important “art” of advertising i.e. the messages/creative.
The influence of the creative is not addressed. Yet I am sure A/B testing (which has huge flaws) is used at some stage by most using Attribution. So, the effectiveness of different creative executions is acknowledged, but it plays no role in Attribution. (No Attribution modelling I have seen has factored in the influence of the creative execution.) Then again, to try and do so would invoke huge error. There are not just so many variables at play, and variables for individuals that can change even daily.
Many marketers are obsessed with data. Which relative to the length of time marketing has been around, is relatively recent, particularly in comparison to social sciences such as Psychology and Sociology. (Pure sciences such as physics, chemistry, geology etc. have been built on data).
Nothing wrong with this. Without the quantitative, a marketer is flying blind. The problems are with the application, in the words of the John Maynard Keynes:
“As a means of suggesting possibilities and probabilities rather than anything else, taken with enough grains of salt and applied with superlative common sense, [econometrics] won’t do much harm. That is how the method ought to be used.”
Unfortunately, in marketing there are way too many practitioners who know just enough about mathematics and statistics (which is just one area of applied maths), to be dangerous. Too often the quantitative analysis is applied without “superlative common sense”.
I can recall when market research surveying switched from mostly door to door, face to face, to telephone surveys. Much faster and cheaper. At a Research Society conference in the early 90s, a major topic was the erosion of the most valuable of all resources – respondents. Telemarketers came out of the woodwork and phoned people under the guise of market research. This was utter bullshit. They were fishing for potential customers, using amateurish surveys to qualify likely candidates.
“Hi, my name is Ralph the Mouth and I am doing a survey on house cladding.” A number of questions were asked and if the person seemed to be a possible candidate, they had sales- person often knocking at the front door, or at least phoning.
The impact, over a relatively short time period, was the householder not taking any calls from telemarketers or genuine research field operations.
By 2019, quantitative research was perceived by so many businesses as easy to do, “a piece of piss”. Just about every company uses Survey Monkey (such an apt name), makes up their own questionnaire or has a friend, relative etc design a questionnaire and 99.9 per cent ask “How likely would you be to refer ……”
The valuable source of respondents has almost run dry. Yes, we have panels, but that brings in a bias i.e. people who will sign up to be paid to provide opinions
If the “respondent” cannot honestly answer a question, there is a very real tendency to provide an answer, as they are being paid for an opinion so better have one.
Due to the inundation of market research, which was once the realm of only large businesses, market research’s most valuable resource i.e. unbiased, genuine respondents, has all but been exhausted.
Now, the results of many quantitative research studies are based on highly suspect samples. (And there are all the DYI operators who not only conduct rubbish studies, but also help consume the valuable resource of genuine respondents).
Out of quantitative research came the bastard child, the Nett Promoter Score.
NPSs seem to have taken on a life of their own, reaching the highest levels of businesses and organisations. The CEO of Westpac, who resigned after the huge scandal of money being sent for the purpose of “kiddie fiddlers”, was quoted as stating it was not a major issue and to get back to “improving our NPS.” And this madness is not a one off – it is becoming common. Recently the CEO of one of the largest private insurers said his executive teams bonuses would be linked directly to NTP scores.
No matter what service I use, or product I purchase, I receive a questionnaire, and all have a NPS question.
I Googled NPS and the first item was:
“Make it Easy to Motivate your Entire Organisation to Become More Customer Focused. NPS Anytime, Anywhere via SMS, Email, Website and Many More. Request Now!”
Excuse the language, but my first reaction was “Fuck me!” – Anytime, anywhere via SMS, Email, Website. Yes, your business and everyone else’s is going to pester people and ask how likely they will be to recommend them.
This is not to say that quantitative measures are useless. They can and do provide valuable information. But as Keynes said a long time ago, they need to be taken with “a grain of salt” and used in conjunction with common sense. (Experience).
Though not statistically valid, getting out into the real world observing and speaking to customers and front- line staff can provide the balance to quantitative measures.
Finally, a little “puzzle” for those obsessed with the quantitative Following is a simple equation which shows 2 = 1. This is obviously not the case, but the algebra is 100 per cent correct. So where is the fault?
I put this problem forward a couple of years ago, offering a bottle of Bollinger to the first person to identify what is wrong, No one could pick it. Same offer is on the table. What is the error, what is wrong with the above equation? If you claim to be literate in mathematics and statistics, then the answer to the above should be very simple. A bottle of Bollinger would go down well at Christmas.
A Merry Christmas and a happy and safe New Year to all.
Latest News
The Unapproved Climate Certification Allegedly Causing Mass Greenwashing
Are you left flummoxed in the canned tuna & free range eggs aisle? Just wait till this green certification gets up.
TV Ratings (22/04/2024): Fans Mock “Over The Top” Reaction To New MasterChef Judges
MasterChef returns for its 2024 season. B&T stands by putting peppercorns in Gravox & no one will be any the wiser.
Dentsu Restructure: Muddle, Harvey & Johnston Take Leadership Baton As Bass & Yurisich Exit
A large broom has swept through Dentsu's local ops this morning, taking with it some big names & the air con's cobwebs.
Industry Shares Trends Shaping The Industry This International Creators Day
B&T's asking adland creators to reveal their top trends. And it's not good news for your Jenny Kee cardigan collection.
Mable Extends HOYTS Sensory Screenings Partnership
Mable has extended its HOYTS sensory screening partnership. Vigorously defends its two-star Oppenheimer review.
Orphan Launches ‘They Need Our Help. We Need Yours’ For Children’s Cancer Institute
Anything to do with childhood cancers has B&T's 110% support. That said, we do ignore the red meat & alcohol warnings.
Smile Team Orthodontics & Keep Left Collaborate On Smile-Inducing Campaign
As parents would attest, given the cost of orthodontics you'd expect this campaign to be a lavish production indeed.
Opinion: How Video Calls Neglect Learning Diversity
Need an excuse to duck out of a video call this arvo? Show this to your boss.
DoubleVerify Achieves First-Of-Its-Kind Responsible AI Certification From TrustArc
DoubleVerify receives responsible AI certification. However, not its robotic vacuum that's been seen menacing the cat.
Smile For A Good Cause: The Social Media Campaign Giving Back To The Community
Are you known as the office Austin Powers? More for you teeth than shagability? Get snappy new fangs with this news.
Elon Musk Mocks Albo After ESafety Wins Court Injunction Against X
Albo's 2024 from hell continues - Rabbitohs in crisis, down in the polls and now feuding with world's richest man.
Real Estate Developer In Hot Water Over “Sexually Exploitative” OOH Campaign
Real estate agents again tops in the 'least trusted profession' polls, nudging used car salesmen & ad creatives.
Epsilon’s Shane Hanby: Post-Cookie Era Relies On “Teamwork” Between Brands, Marketers & Tech
This pro predicts more "teamwork" in a post-cookie era. Which spells bad news for the uncooperative or plain stubborn.
Entries For Five Decades Of Advertising Graduates Awards Close On Monday
Entries for the Five Decades of Advertising awards close Monday. And no extensions! Any bribery is open til Wednesday.
Cadbury Extends Commitment To Women’s Sport With Sweet New Wallaroos Deal
Rot your teeth, get fat and support women's sport all at the same time with this sweet new sponsorship arrangement.
Campfire X & Nando’s Partner To Acknowledge Traditional Land Owners Across Australia
Chicken chain unveils important First Nations initiative. The actual chickens more concerned with the Adani coal mine.
Lisa Ronson, Naysla Edwards & Ben Hill Join MFA Awards Signature Judging Panel
MFA Awards adds some serious clout to its judging panel. Still no confirmation Paulini will be performing on the night.
Connect Hearing ‘Sounds Good’ Platform Via Bread Agency
Every office has that one hard of hearing person that's oblivious to the fact. Ramp up their insecurities with this.
Ipsos Iris Data: Australians Prioritise Entertainment & Sports Over Serious News In March
Data shows Aussies prioritising light entertainment over hard news. And who can blame them if you've seen the hard news!
Fur Media Partners With Mad Paws To Support Advertisers
It's never good if your office smells like faeces & brine chunks in aspic. Not if you're pet-friendly agency Fur Media.
MAXIBON Drops Epic Flavour Collaboration Via SICKDOGWOLFMAN
There are few pluses to be had with global warming, except the extension of ice-cream eating season.
Sling & Stone Scrubs Up With Lush Account
Got friends at Sling & Stone? Expect the dreaded loofah and bath bomb for birthdays/Christmas this year.
SBS’s The Cook Up With Adam Liaw Produces ‘Fewer CO2 Emissions Than Industry Average’
SBS could go full vegan for Adam Liaw's seventh season and reduce its TV audience and emissions by 99 per cent.
GumGum & Playground xyz To Merge Media Portfolio, Creating “Powerhouse” Ad Suite
GumGum & Playground xyz tap into consumer mindset. B&T prefers tapping a keg, but whatever works.
All The Winners & Grinners From The TikTok Young Lions Awards Night!
Last week saw every part of the human experience: Exalted, devastated, exhausted & stuffing sausage rolls in the corner.
TV Ratings (21/4/24): Farmer Wants A Wife Wins Sunday Prime Time
Farmer Wants A Wife does make the country life seductive. Apart from the manure stench & the bleating roosters at 5am.
Australia’s Automotive Industry Shifts Gears With CTV
How much was CTV responsible for Australia's record car sales in 2023? Or those horrible oversized American utes?
Australia’s C7EVEN Communications Launches Services In Japan With New Tokyo Office
Aussie comms agency unveils its Tokyo plans. Confirms it's still getting the hang of the toilets over there.
Daniel Goldstein Promoted To Head Of PR At Example
Try as he may to surreptitiously blend in with the wall in his photo, this PR fellow still relatively easy to spot.
Marie Claire & Volvo Partner For The Planet: Nominees For The Inaugural Marie Claire Sustainability Awards Announced
Fashion bible Marie Claire unveils its Sustainability Awards. Yet still refusing to recycle 2023's maxi skirts trend.
Sefiani Unveils A Wave Of Promotions & Appointments
Life's good in PR/comms as Sefiani unveils new hires. Well, bad news for media sites obsessed with redundancy stories.
Yahoo Launches Identity Solutions For CTV
Connected TV just got a whole lot more exciting with this innovation. Bar the incessant Friends re-runs.
Infosum Launches Data Clean Room Solution With Samsung Ads Australia
Infosum & Samsung Ads launch a data clean room solution that's a lot more than a Wettex & squirt of Ajax.
Fast 10: Bread Agency’s Amaury Treguer On Its “Unrivalled” Social Commerce Focus
Bread Agency's Amaury Treguer takes B&T's Fast 10, as he reveals why he won't be sandwiched up against the opposition.
X And Elon Musk To Sue Australia’s eSafety Commissioner Over Sydney Stabbing Takedown Order
If this all wasn't traumatic enough, Elon weighs in to prove he's the world's richest man & world's biggest dickhead.
CRA Siren Award To Be Presented At B&T Awards 2024!
Often attend award nights & think "I wish this night would never end"? Well, B&T's just got that tiny bit longer.
If from the start X = Y then X – Y = 0 which means you can’t divide by (X – Y) and can’t arrive at X + Y = Y.