What Are The Ethics For Agencies When A Client Is Doing ‘Science’?

What Are The Ethics For Agencies When A Client Is Doing ‘Science’?
SHARE
THIS



We’re being bombarded with facts and figures from self-interested groups with a message to peddle. But in this opinion piece, CEO of Holler, Mike Hill, argues it’s agencies that are the ones that are forced to make the campaigns based on claims that often hold little substance at all…

As a proponent of GM technology and a natural skeptic, this ad by Forsman & Bodenfors caught my eye when it popped up in my feed 50 times in the space of two days. A swathe of top creative and ad execs perpetuated this nonsense on social media with an air of ‘I told you so’ arrogance. Meanwhile, the scientific community is looking at us like a pack of slack-jawed mental midgets.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZorjPQXmSs

The subject of my distain was commissioned by Swedish Supermarket chain Coop, to conduct an experiment to determine what happens to your body when you switch from eating conventionally farmed foods to organic.

They enlisted the help of a typical Swedish family (the Palmbergs) to take part in their three-week experiment. In the first week, the five members of the family ate their usual non-organic meals, and provided urine samples each day. In independent tests conducted by the Swedish Environmental Research Institute, eight of a chosen twelve pesticides showed up in their systems.

Then came the big reveal: for the remainder of the study the Palmbergs switched to 100% organic food. New urine samples were taken, and after a few days almost all of the pesticides had miraculously disappeared.

Sounds pretty harmless, right? Wrong.

Before I tell you why, it’s important we clear up the biggest Myth about Organic Foods: “Organic farmers don’t use pesticides”. This is just bollocks. Organic farmers use pesticide just like conventional farmers. This is not opinion, this is fact.

What was not clear from the Forsman & Bodenfors campaign, is that the agency omitted crucial data to fit their argument. They did not test for residues from the many pesticides used in organic agriculture, such as lime sulphur, pyrethrums or iron (III) phosphate, to name just a few.

The glaringly obvious conclusion to their study is that pesticides used in conventional farming do not show up in the body when eating organic food (just as pesticides used in organic agriculture do not show up in conventionally farmed foods). Who would’ve thought?

As Melanie Mallon points out in her excellent and damming expose of this experiment, this is the equivalent of proving that not drinking alcohol will lead to little or no alcohol in your system, compared with drinking alcohol.

This study is woeful in it’s scientific validity. It wouldn’t pass in a grade four Science Fair. It’s actually pseudoscience, perpetuated by unqualified quacks and passionate bloggers. It’s as bad as the ignorance of anti-vaxxers and chemtrail nutbags, and an experiment that has gone out of its way to skew the data to mislead the general public and create a story that is simply not true.

But so what? It’s not doing anyone harm, is it? So some people will eat more organic foods, who cares? Why has this Swedish ad agency’s flawed experiment got me so riled up?

I should be clear: I am not anti-organic, I am just pro-GMO. And while this experiment does not specifically tackle the GMO debate, the general public sees Organic and GMO as opposing forces. Good vs. Evil. Anything pro-organic is seen as anti-GMO and vice versa. This ad is inadvertently slowing or even reversing progression in the acceptance of GMO as a safe, environmentally friendlier way of doing big agriculture.

And fear mongering about macro issues like this kills people.

Take for example Greenpeace and green activists, who have continued to roadblock legislation and progress into the life-saving Golden Rice. A recent study suggested that the delayed application of Golden Rice in India alone has cost nearly 1.5 million life years since 2002, when it was originally shelved. This accounts not only for those who died, but also for the blindness and other health disabilities caused by vitamin A deficiencies.

In the age of (mis)information, the internet has become a breading ground for self-inflated, ‘experts’ on food and health. Bloggers such as Vani Hari AKA Food Babe, whose wild claims include that microwaves can cause severe health issues, have amassed armies of scientifically-ignorant fans only too willing to take her unqualified scaremongering as gospel.

For every Yvette d’Entremont, an analytical chemist who recently posted an article slating Food Babe, there are millions of people who accept the opinions of bloggers like Vani and supermarket chains as truth verbatim.

Which leads us back to our Swedish friends Forsman & Bodenfors. Should we just accept that this is the nature of advertising, and if an ethically-questionable study increases the sales of organic goods in Coop’s stores across Sweden, then surely they have just done their job?

I would passionately argue that we should not. I hope that we’re all better than this. I’m not talking about the blurry-lined advertising we’ve all been part of at a product or brand level. This is bigger. It’s a category job. It’s affecting millions of people.

Forsman & Bodenfors’ short video documenting the Coop campaign was as clever as it was deceitful, carrying all the hallmarks of legitimate scientific study. It included sound bites from a white coat professor tucked away in a lab and eye-catching ‘before and after’ graphics that attempt to leave you in no doubt that anything but organic food is effectively poison. If this wasn’t enough to stir the fear in your bones or tug on the heartstrings, they included the Palmberg’s children next to the graphs to remind you that not only are you poisoning yourself, you’re also poisoning your own children. For the love of God not the children!

It begs the question as to whether advertising is still stuck in the ethical dark ages of the 1950s (remember the ‘freshness of smoking’?) where agencies can brazenly cherry pick data and present something to the public that leaves out any inconvenient information.

Big data is certainly the buzzword of the moment and has an integral role to play in the world of advertising. At Holler, we use data to gather insights we can’t get anywhere else. As much as we depend on these insights to strengthen the causes of our clients, we are acutely aware of responsibility to use data correctly, and above all honestly.

None of us are squeaky clean in advertising. It’s our job to persuade, and to do so we’ll leverage emotions, embellish truths, invent needs and select facts. But when we start fixing the results and calling it science, I say we’ve crossed the line. As advertisers we have a moral (not to mention legal) duty to the truth, especially when it comes to macro trends like big agriculture, which can have far-reaching and potentially tragic implications.

Whether Forsman & Bodenfors lied or simply didn’t understand the data is debatable. They were either deceitful or stupid, and both are inexcusable when communicating such a significant message.

Latest News

Why Programmatic Needs To Become A Branding Machine
  • Advertising
  • Marketing
  • Opinion
  • Technology

Why Programmatic Needs To Become A Branding Machine

In this opinion piece, Phil Murrell (pictured below), country manager for Australia and New Zealand at Sizmek, argues that programmatic ad spend needs to move up the branding funnel. When I started in digital advertising way back in 2004, we got our media insertion orders via the fax machine. We relied on that machine to […]

Opinion

by B&T Magazine

B&T Magazine
Do Not Disconnect… Why The Telephone Is Still As Relevant For Advertisers As Ever
  • Opinion

Do Not Disconnect… Why The Telephone Is Still As Relevant For Advertisers As Ever

In this guest post, CEO of Delacon, Michael Center (pictured below), argues in favour of something we don’t hear too much a bout these days – the good old fashioned telephone… It’s 142 years since Alexander Graham Bell made his first call on 10 March 1876 to his assistant Thomas Watson, where he uttered the […]

Opinion

by B&T Magazine

B&T Magazine
An Apology To Salmat’s Karen Lewis
  • Media

An Apology To Salmat’s Karen Lewis

Whoops! B&T's stuffed up and this certainly comes with our sincerest apologies for any offence caused.

by B&T Magazine

B&T Magazine
Adland Execs To Be Locked Up
  • Media

Adland Execs To Be Locked Up

Continuing adland's fascination with prison when it comes to charitable causes comes this latest trip to the slammer.

Australian Directors’ Guild Announces Mentorship Winners
  • Campaigns
  • Media

Australian Directors’ Guild Announces Mentorship Winners

Now in its second year, the Australian Directors’ Guild’s (ADG) Commercial & Content Directing Mentorship program announced its next round of eight mentoree recipients. The winners were announced at a special event held last night at FINCH, Sydney and attended by members of the screen and advertising industries. Acclaimed director, and ADG President, Samantha Lang, […]

Diversity Case Study Series: OMD
  • Advertising
  • Marketing
  • Media

Diversity Case Study Series: OMD

One need only look at the Cadbury Favourites chocolate selection to know it has nought to do with industry diversity.

by B&T Magazine

B&T Magazine
Eyeota Deep Dives Into Australian Automotive Purchase Behaviour
  • Media

Eyeota Deep Dives Into Australian Automotive Purchase Behaviour

Eyeota, the global leader in audience data, has today released its latest results on automotive purchase intentions in Australia. The results provide a deep dive into what motivates the buyer and segments those into six different personas.

APN Outdoor Joins The AANA
  • Marketing
  • Media

APN Outdoor Joins The AANA

AANA's annual Christmas dinner and dance got a teensy bit more crowded following this announcement this morning.

QMS Introduces ‘The Lonsdale’ To Melbourne
  • Advertising
  • Media

QMS Introduces ‘The Lonsdale’ To Melbourne

Digital outdoor media company QMS Media has turned on a new premium landmark digital billboard situated in the heart of Melbourne’s CBD. Delivering a commanding presence at the major intersection of Lonsdale and Russell Streets, ‘The Lonsdale’ offers extended dwell times to both vehicle and pedestrian traffic, impacting more than 2.2 million contacts per month. […]

Portrait of a woman looking through out the blinds. Office worker looking through window blinds
  • Opinion

The Lurking Brand Threats Facing CMOs

Treading on gardening rakes and possible alien abduction notable omissions from this CMO threats piece.

Opinion

by B&T Magazine

B&T Magazine
Women In Media Profile: Susannah George
  • Media

Women In Media Profile: Susannah George

B&T is delighted to profile Urbanlist supremo Susannah George who, we understand, is not related to George Brandis.

by B&T Magazine

B&T Magazine
Ikon Lands Avis Budget Group Account
  • Advertising
  • Marketing
  • Media

Ikon Lands Avis Budget Group Account

B&T chooses and recommends Avis and John Karandonis shoes. Hang on, that was the end of Sale Of The Century.

by B&T Magazine

B&T Magazine
Principals Appoints New Creative Director For Melbourne
  • Marketing

Principals Appoints New Creative Director For Melbourne

Branding design agency Principals has announced the appointment of Pip Ireland as its Melbourne creative director. Ireland, who has been freelancing with the agency for the past six months, has previously held roles at Designworks in New Zealand and Melbourne as well as Moon Communications in Sydney. Principals executive creative director Simon Wright said: “We’ve […]

Pureprofile Unveils Next-Level Audience Segmentation Offering With RDA Research
  • Media
  • Technology

Pureprofile Unveils Next-Level Audience Segmentation Offering With RDA Research

Global media and technology company Pureprofile has partnered with RDA Research to enable further audience segmentation across its audience profiles. RDA Research’s geoTribes is a unique classification system that rivals traditional geodemographic approaches by grouping consumers into fifteen ‘tribes’ based on their life stage and socio-economic status. Clients are then able to better understand consumer […]