Review of Media Ownership Laws Signals Dawn Of A New Era

Review of Media Ownership Laws Signals Dawn Of A New Era
SHARE
THIS



With the media ownership laws undergoing a review by Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull, OMD’s Adam O’Neill looks at how this will affect brands playing in the Aussie media landscape.

Newsrooms across the country are running hot, private equity is circling and commentators are banging out notes speculating how the cards will fall as the media sector in Australia prepares for a wave of merger and acquisition (M&A) activity. It is somewhat surprising then that brands and those responsible for allocating advertising dollars have been relatively quiet on how this may play out.

Medieval Madness

To give context, the current media ownership laws were put in place by the Keating Government 27 years ago and are currently undergoing a review by the Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull with the objective to unshackle the media industry and take us into the 21st Century.

Back in 1997, a number of regulations were put in place to restrict the ownership of commercial television, newspaper and radio licenses so that no more than two licences could be held by the same party, in any given city, around the country. Badged the “Two out of Three” rule, this legislation aimed to establish a balance of opinion of at least two voices in each city across the major media channels. To date, these laws have ensured Australians a balanced point of view, however, today with prevalent access to content in many shapes and sizes, this type of regulation is no longer necessary.

The other piece of legislation, the 75% reach rule, stipulated that an individual media owner could not reach more than three quarters of the national population. Today, this unfairly imposes restrictions on television, newspaper and radio operations whilst allowing digital media companies, such as Google, Twitter, Facebook and other media behemoths such as The Huff Post, The Daily Mail Online and The Guardian, to enter, access and profit in Australia without hindrance.

Certainly, the introduction of digital media businesses has had a profound influence on how Australians consume their entertainment, news and sporting content. The list of benefits is a long one. Australians should have a right of access to information from national or international sources, regardless of which Australian town or city they reside in. In its own evolution, the internet has granted Australians this access. So why then, should established television, newspaper and radio companies be restricted by such an antiquated and unequitable piece of legislation?

As a media agency, and on behalf of our clients, our organisation has been focusing efforts on rebalancing advertising investment to follow the growing audience trends of digital media and to consider new digital media business models such as Buzzfeed, The Guardian and The Huff Post. It follows that we, and on behalf of our clients brands, should also be able to rebalance investment on a larger scale, by partnering with multi-channel media companies who have a national presence across the country.

The first step in creating an equitable regulatory landscape would be to abolish the 75% reach rule so that Metropolitan Media owners could acquire or merge with their Regional affiliates allowing national brands and their agencies to access audiences without the need to operate via several different operating companies. A true national media partner with a single point of contact could not only unlock value of resource efficiency, but give Australians access to a national standard in quality of entertainment, news and sporting content regardless of where they live.

Whilst this goal appears to be simple enough in vision, it is significantly more difficult to execute with a number of M&A transactions needing to take place.

Possible M&A Transactions without deregulation

The good news is that a handful of M&A transactions can actually take place without the need for changes to the ownership laws. The Communications Minister raised the prospect of media deregulation for the second time a few months ago, however the government has been unable to draw a consensus on the topic and has subsequently delayed further action. Meanwhile, the trading environment for media companies hasn’t changed. Most still face a growing list of commercial pressures; fragmentation of audiences, added competition of digital media and the harsh reality of operating in a relatively small, mature advertising market with single digit growth year on year. So, something has to give.

These factors are forcing media owners into M&A transactions not only to defend their territory but also to secure their balance sheets as the Australian economy doesn’t look to be serving up anything spectacular in the next 12 months.

Device convergence is adding additional pressure on some subscription based media companies, telecoms and online media companies who are now all effectively operating in the same space, competing for the same lucrative advertising dollars and thus competing for viewer’s attention.

Whilst difficult to speculate who will move first, when the M&A does start, the changes will be made rapidly and it will all end swiftly as the first to move will potentially lock out other transactions. Just looking at the sheer number of headlines in recent months this indicates the ground swell is increasing. Television broadcasters will be buying radio stations, newspaper groups will merge with television broadcasters, outdoor networks will start selling assets to reduce debt and so on. Media companies with strong balance sheets, such as News Corp, Seven West Group and Fairfax are likely to be the first movers.

Earlier this month Lachlan Murdoch, ex-chairman of the financially challenged Network Ten, had openly stated that he is open for conversations to offload his interests in DMG Nova. There is more to this move than what appears to be the initial motivation, given such a sale could allow News Corp or Foxtel to partner up with Network Ten, a deal offering financial and structural synergies in both securing sports rights on the front end and shared resources such as sales, management and operations in the back end. Given the current debt levels some media companies such as Network Ten are operating at the prospect of M&A could offer them a much needed lifeline.

What’s in it for brands?

This is a positive development for clients and their agencies who will soon be able to secure national entertainment, news and sporting content across platforms and devices with a reduced need to combine multiple media owner contracts. This should also allow advertiser with simplified terms such as IP rights, production and distribution costs.

Working through this thought with a specific example, consider if Foxtel and their majority owners, Telstra and News Corp, started opening up consumer based media packages so you could combine your broadband subscription, with selected Foxtel content, with a mobile contract, with a digital subscription to the daily newspaper. Allowing you to watch your favourite entertainment, news or sporting events across any device, at any time, with one-single monthly subscription.

The current regulations mean that for a consumer trying to watch this content or for arguments sake a brand trying to secure this inventory, you would need to plan, negotiate and execute at least three separate contractual agreements.

When these mergers settle, the benefits for brands and ultimately consumers will quickly add up. Firstly, it will be easier than ever to access personalised and interesting content from a single source regardless of platform or device. Digital companies have been doing this since their inception, and hence with rumours of over the top services such as Netflix rumoured to be planning a market entry in Australia one can start to see their unfair advantage.  Secondly, with the ability to negotiate and execute national campaigns through a single source perhaps brands and agencies can see the advantages in freeing up time to focus on the content creation and distribution itself.

Whether the ownership laws change today or several months into the future is debatable. However, with this in mind, the imminent wave of M&A activity not only looks more interesting for brands and consumers, but for media companies has become a business necessity.

Adam O’Neill is the business director at OMD

Please login with linkedin to comment

Latest News

Case Study: How Content Helped Tribal Marketing Come To Life Amongst Rev-Heads.
  • Opinion

Case Study: How Content Helped Tribal Marketing Come To Life Amongst Rev-Heads.

In this guest post, CEO of content marketing agency Edge, Fergus Stoddart (pictured below), says brands would do well to play on their customer’s loyal tribalism… Normally over Christmas, any downtime is spent asleep on the sofa, mildly lubricated with a belly full. This year, with the Ashes in the background, I managed to stay awake […]

Opinion

by B&T Magazine

B&T Magazine
Red Bull Holden Racing Team Unveils 2018 Cars On Sydney Harbour
  • Marketing

Red Bull Holden Racing Team Unveils 2018 Cars On Sydney Harbour

Red Bull Holden Racing team took the covers off its 2018 Holden Commodore Supercar today. Floating on a barge in Farm Cove, the harbour provided a stunning backdrop for the reveal. Teammates Jamie Whincup and Shane van Gisbergen have won the past two championships for the squad. Whincup, now the greatest of all time with seven Supercar’s titles, […]

Victorian Government Launches VR Bushfire Experience Via The Fuel Agency
  • Advertising
  • Campaigns
  • Technology

Victorian Government Launches VR Bushfire Experience Via The Fuel Agency

As part of its summer fire campaign, the Victorian government has launched a virtual reality (VR) bushfire experience and content series via The Fuel Agency. The VR experience places the user in the midst of a large bushfire, and is designed to encourage people to leave early on high-risk days before it’s too late. The […]

Local Ad Tech Company VeNA Partners With RugbyPass
  • Advertising
  • Media
  • Technology

Local Ad Tech Company VeNA Partners With RugbyPass

ad tech company VeNA has signed an exclusive reseller partnership covering Australia and New Zealand with digital rugby network RugbyPass. Across Asia and parts of Europe, RugbyPass is the exclusive digital rights holder and over-the-top broadcaster for live rugby, including the Super Rugby, the Rugby Championship and autumn internationals, the Six Nations, the Aviva Premiership, […]

SpotX Appoints Gavin Buxton As Asia MD
  • Advertising

SpotX Appoints Gavin Buxton As Asia MD

Video advertising platform SpotX has announced it has appointed Gavin Buxton as managing director of Asia to lead the company’s expansion in the region. Buxton has over 17 years’ global experience in the digital advertising space, having worked in leadership roles at tech and publishing companies, including Microsoft, Turner Broadcasting, and LinkedIn, with the last […]

Big Mobile Doubles Down On Ad Tech & Rebrands
  • Advertising
  • Technology

Big Mobile Doubles Down On Ad Tech & Rebrands

B&T Awards 2017 finalist Big Mobile has unveiled a fresh look to reflect its new ad tech credentials. The company successfully pivoted its business from ad network to mobile ad tech vendor when it announced a joint venture (JV) with Widespace in October last year. As a result of the business changes, Big Mobile wanted […]

March One Appoints New Senior Account Manager
  • Advertising

March One Appoints New Senior Account Manager

Independent ad agency March One has appointed a fresh face to the team, with Melanie Tozer to reinforce its mission to put humans first as a senior account manager. Tozer (pictured above), an up-and-coming talent from New Zealand, will align her extensive experience in FMCG marketing with March One, having worked on accounts for Bunnings […]