Darren Woolley: Three Ways To Pay For Programmatic (But Only One That Delivers Value)

Darren Woolley: Three Ways To Pay For Programmatic (But Only One That Delivers Value)

In this guest post, Darren Woolley (pictured below), CEO at TrinityP3 Marketing Management Consultants, looks at programmatic trading and examines the best route for agencies…

There is much written about programmatic media buying and the remuneration models being deployed. The K2 Report on Media Transparency and Rebates commissioned by the ANA, highlighted the two most popular models being the “disclosed” and the “non-disclosed models”.

darren-woolley

But there is a third more effective remuneration model, which is the performance media model.

Many marketers have told me that in most cases the adoption of programmatic media buying has been at their media agency’s insistence and therefore they often find themselves using the programmatic trading desk that is owned by the holding company that owns their media agency.

Often they are also unaware that they have a number of options in regard to remuneration models for paying for these services, with the trading desk proposing a particular model.

From our experience the preference of the agency appears to be the non-disclosed model, or sometimes the choice between the disclosed and non-disclosed. But I have not personally heard of a programmatic trading desk recommending a performance-based model.

Let’s look at each of these options to see if we can determine why.

Two most discussed models

It is indicative of the preference of the two models that they are not only referred to in the K2 report, but also that in most of the discussions had with media agency leaders the only models they discuss are the disclosed and non-disclosed model.

It’s as if it’s the start, middle and end of the remuneration discussion.

One media agency CEO was explaining that all of their clients who were using their programmatic desk were given the two choices for how they would pay the programmatic trading desk.

On one hand they were offered the disclosed model with, in his words, complete transparency on costs and an agreed agency commission. In this case it was 30 per cent.

On the other hand there was the non-disclosed model were the advertiser would be guaranteed a price for the media that was less than they were paying now, but there was no opportunity for the advertiser to audit the buying.

He gleefully shared that to date his clients had largely chosen the non-disclosed model. I shared this story at the ANA Advertising Financial Management Conference in May this year. But let’s consider the issues associated with each of these models.

Disclosed model

The transparency that is offered by the disclosed model looks attractive to many marketers wanting insight into what they are paying for, but it can be quite superficial, depending on how it is arranged.

The ability to audit the media agency in many situations is irrelevant if the trading desk is a separate corporate entity. It usually is and this means the audit provisions with the media agency are not enforceable with the trading desk.

In fact, we have been privy to many of the agreements between the media agency and their holding company trading desk and in almost every case there is a clause that excludes the audit provision.

What this means is that if you undertake an audit of the media agency, you will be able to determine if your media agency is taking the right level of commission, but what you cannot determine is if the price they are paying the trading desk is the amount they paid for the media.

Effectively this means that while it is called the disclosed model, only one step in the transaction is actually transparent. And there can be up to five of six parties involved in the transaction. Perhaps it should be called the almost disclosed model?

Non-disclosed model

At least with the non-disclosed model the name reflects the actual circumstances of the deal. As famously said by the chairman of one media agency group: “We are transparent in the fact that we are not transparent”.

The reason the agencies give for this approach is that it allows them to use the spend power across multiple clients to negotiate better deals and therefore they are unable to allow an audit as it would require providing access to other clients’ spend information.

Some cynically believe that the reason for the non-disclosure and banning of audits is that it would reveal any arbitrage. Arbitrage is where the holding company buys inventory in bulk from the publisher and on-sells it to clients of the media agency they own through the trading desk at a significant margin.

In regards to the guarantee that the price paid will be less than what they are paying at the moment, this can be hard to monitor, unless you assume that all media is a commodity.

But the fact is that while there is a huge amount of digital media inventory, there is still premium inventory and trashy inventory. The issue is knowing if your lower price is because they are buying the same quality of media or simply unloading the dross onto your media buy.

Performance model

The question that often comes up, is what is the purpose of the media buy? If it is to generate leads or drive conversion then why not pay for the results, rather than just the media cost?

It is possible.

There are a number of programmatic trading desks that are able to buy your digital media on a performance basis.

Of course this requires you to have a very clear objective, sound strategy and a definable target audience, along with a a financial view of what is the value of success.

But that should be an entry point for anyone investing in digital media. After all, one of the great things about digital is the ability to target specific audiences and to optimise the performance of the media buy in real time.

Performance media means that you are able to invest your media spend and all of the issues regarding transparency, viewability and click fraud become irrelevant because you are paying on the results of the campaign.

Yet unless you raise it with your media agency and their trading desk it is unlikely they will offer it. But if you are willing to make your media investment accountable then it is a better option than the two the agencies are pushing.

Which is the right model for you?

The first point is you have options. You have the ability to choose the programmatic trading desk that is right for you and not simply take the one your media agency recommends.

Secondly, you have options in how you pay for your media. Beyond the disclosed and non-disclosed model, the other option is to pay for your media based on the results or the performance of the media buy.

Ultimately the choice is yours. But it is better to make the right choice for your needs than simply following the recommendations of your media agency.

This article originally appeared on B&T’s sister business site www.which-50.com

Please login with linkedin to comment

Exclusive

Latest News

Starts At 60 Makes Two Executive Appointments
  • Media

Starts At 60 Makes Two Executive Appointments

Mature-age media platform Starts at 60 has welcomed two new leaders to its executive team as it looks to scale up and broaden its commercialisation. Amena Reza (pictured above, right) moves into the role of chief operating officer. She was formerly the managing director of ML Design, and is a chartered accountant and a non-executive […]

HubSpot Creates ‘Marketing Hub Starter’ For Small Businesses
  • Marketing
  • Technology

HubSpot Creates ‘Marketing Hub Starter’ For Small Businesses

Marketing software player HubSpot has launched Marketing Hub Starter, a new software offering that aims to give growing teams the tools they need to start marketing right. This new tier of HubSpot’s platform is designed with small businesses in mind, consolidating the capabilities of existing disparate marketing tools into one platform and offering an affordable […]

Market Research Industry Cracks Down On Shonky Behaviour With New Digital Platform
  • Marketing

Market Research Industry Cracks Down On Shonky Behaviour With New Digital Platform

The Association of Market and Social Research Organisations (AMSRO) has launched a digital platform to highlight fake or illegitimate research activities to the public. ‘Phish of the Day’ enables AMSRO members, as well as the general public, to report any scams or non-genuine market and social research activities to the association. These might include telemarketing […]

Pooled Energy Appoints Magnum & Co And The Wired Agency
  • Advertising
  • Marketing

Pooled Energy Appoints Magnum & Co And The Wired Agency

Swimming pool electricity retailer Pooled Energy has appointed Magnum & Co and sister agency The Wired Agency to its roster, following a competitive pitch. Magnum & Co will handle Pooled Energy’s social media and PR, while The Wired Agency has been appointed to manage the company’s search and display advertising. Both agencies will collaborate with […]

Masculinity Roasted In Clever New Ad
  • Advertising
  • Campaigns

Masculinity Roasted In Clever New Ad

Think masculinity means drinking a case without chundering? Well, rediscover it (& possibly yourself) with this top ad.

by B&T Magazine

B&T Magazine
WPP AUNZ Partners With Career Trackers Indigenous Internship Program
  • Advertising

WPP AUNZ Partners With Career Trackers Indigenous Internship Program

Advertising and marketing network WPP AUNZ has joined the Career Trackers Indigenous Internship Program as part of its commitment to a diverse workforce, and the creation of opportunities that inspire excellence. As part of the program, WPP AUNZ has welcomed its first three interns: Abi-Leigh Dillon (WPP AUNZ), Amy Mccutcheon (MediaCom) and Jacinta Evans (Ogilvy), […]

Taboo Goes On A Hiring Spree
  • Advertising

Taboo Goes On A Hiring Spree

Taboo has gone a hiring spree. And when it comes to sprees, that's far better than a shooting one or a farting one.

M&C Saatchi Group’s 1440 Shuts Up Shop
  • Marketing

M&C Saatchi Group’s 1440 Shuts Up Shop

Sadly, M&C Saatchi's 1440 is no more. And chances of it being reborn as 1550 not looking much chop either.

by B&T Magazine

B&T Magazine
Luke Kelly Becomes A Partner At HBT
  • Advertising
  • Marketing
  • Technology

Luke Kelly Becomes A Partner At HBT

B&T's not sure what's with that twirly thing in the press photo, suffice to say a vortex to an alternate dimension?

Women In Media Profile: Alison Michalk
  • Media

Women In Media Profile: Alison Michalk

If B&T's Women in Media profiles were an animal they would be a gazelle or lioness, or even a lioness eating a gazelle.

by B&T Magazine

B&T Magazine
Grant Broadcasters Makes Several Changes To Senior Executive Team
  • Media

Grant Broadcasters Makes Several Changes To Senior Executive Team

Independent media company Grant Broadcasters has announced a number of changes to its executive ranks. Grant Cameron will move up to become non-executive chairman for the company, and Alison Cameron (pictured above) – currently the chief operating officer – will assume the CEO role. Dugald Cameron remains responsible for the family’s investment portfolio and is […]