Subscribers:   Visitors: register or subscribe.
  Home  |  Advertising  |  Creative  |  Integrated  |  Marketing  |  Media  |  Planning + Buying  |  Directory  |  Jobs
 SEARCH ARCHIVE
search tips
 DIRECTORY
Media
By Category
By Title
Companies
By Category
By Name
People
Advertisers
AARDS
directory tips
 B&T Events
 - B&T Awards
 - Digital Bootcamp
 DIARY
 CLASSIFIEDS
 SUBSCRIBE
 TO ADVERTISE

 

 

 
 

 

 [BLOG HOMEPAGE]  [BLOG INFO] 

The truth behind that retail Mecca

By Tony Kelly

When I used to live in Singapore I’d come back home to Sydney to visit and would meet new people who would say, ‘oh you live in Singapore I love Singapore’, and I’d say yeah it’s clean and everything but do you know they hang young Singaporeans in Changi prison every weekend?

People never really believed me or politely moved on to other more appropriate dinner conversation, but now that an Aussie is about to end his days depressingly far from home under a law few people here agree with and most are strongly opposed to, this is the only dinner conversation I am hearing at the moment.

In the end I left Singpore for many reasons, but one of them was definitely the silent oppression you feel in that island city-state expressed through the government owned media and a kind of affluent apathy. The prevailing attitude is if we keep everyone rich no-one is going to question the government.

We used to go to bars and clubs which had signs out the front which said “Ecstacy means 30 years prison” and if you think they don’t mean it you can often find evidence of it at the back of the Straits Times where a small line entry about someone being incarcerated for life or hanged, acts as a cautionary tale for anyone who strays off the correct path of prosperity and sameness.

There were even rumours which went if you were found with a small amount of narcotic in Singapore, say enough for a decent night out in Sydney, and you were a foreigner, you were taken to Changi airport put on a plane home and told to never come back to Singapore again – but if you were a local you would be locked up for a very long time.

While there are severe penalties for speaking out against the Singapore Government, an occasional brave soul who wasn’t prepared to accept the rules would speak out against laws that meant kids experimenting with drugs and alcohol in the way young people do all over the world, could find themselves locked up for a very long time. You would usually read about it in a publication not based in Singapore, because the Straits Times doesn’t report on dissidents.

I met a lot of wonderful people in Singapore but it was a place I knew I would never live long term, I missed the freedoms of Australia too much. You begin to feel a little unreal after a while in Singapore, it’s partly the relentless monotone of the equatorial heat but it’s also the equally unrelenting persistence of an iron fisted regime in a silk glove.

I am sure most of you watched with the same frustration I did as Nguyen Tuong Van’s mum left to go and spend a few days with him before his impending execution. There is nothing right about this, no matter how much noise the hysterical right wing anti-drug lobby makes. The death penalty is the last refuge of a barbarian society that has given up on law and order. Thankfully we live in a civilized society.

Comments
I am a singaporean, and I am proud of it. You dont see me cowering in fear every moment of my life due to the death penalty. We are not hang happy people, we also abhor killing. You say that we're barbaric, whats more barbaric? The fact that a man was rightfully punished for a crime he did despite fully knowing the consequences, or the fact that the society allows people to ruin many lives for a little bit of cash? Unlike you, Singaporeans have a very different view on drugs, its not just something for "enough for a decent night out in Sydney" it KILLS, it ruins lives, its not some party drink that you forget the next day. So you think that we all lead bland and boring lives? So you think commiting crimes makes you unique and cool? There are many ways to speak out against the goverment, but peddling drugs surely not the way. If the freedom of a country means the freedom to commit crimes without fear of dire consequences, Im sorry, but no thanks man.
Posted by Crime does not pay. on Saturday, 26 August 2006
Offensive? Unsuitable? Report This Comment
Hi John, Don't think there is anyone stopping you moving back to Ireland mate!!! If you REALLY wanted to, you could.
Posted by TJC on Tuesday, 6 December 2005
Offensive? Unsuitable? Report This Comment
Lots of Banter on this thread of the Big Idea blog - and respect to the tounge in cheek comments from TK on the fact we live in a civilized set-up ....scanning the crap press down under this weekend - it was 50 50 to either side.....the bloke is dead, was a good guy and a crimbo - a son - and a nasty person et al....all said and done - its not right to do this - worse, australia is the modern day SA .....and I live here - Wish I was back home in Ireland - where bobby sands will be remebered long after this idiot....
Posted by john.riley on Monday, 5 December 2005
Offensive? Unsuitable? Report This Comment
Totally agree Bruce with your thoughts.
Posted by TJC on Monday, 5 December 2005
Offensive? Unsuitable? Report This Comment
Originally Singapore was the drug gateway in the East, and 50% of its income depended on opium & heroine trade. Then the clean-up. http://www.chr.asn.au/freestyler/gui/files/Singapore1.pdf  ).
Today Singapore has become an affluent "near crime free"nation through strict discipline with very low crime statistics. Most crime is still drug related, 50% of prison pop of 15,000 (of 4.5 million) serving terms for abuse and not for trafficking.
Get some perspective. When you fly into Changi Airport, your entry forms warn you in bold RED writing that drugs are a capital offence. On entering you are asked whether you have drugs. You even have a "last chance rubbish bin" to discard any drugs, no questions asked.
These drugs, " the Australian" smuggled were not intended for "personal use". The deterrent works. The publicity is good. You know the rules. You traffic. You get caught. You hang. QED.

You must understand that TRAFFICKING in drugs is not POSSESSION of drugs; the latter does NOT carry the death penalty in Singapore. This guy had quantity; he was a drug trafficker, not some casual student.

Dont be fooled by misleading stats either( highest per capital hangings etc) . In Singapore, drug arrests fell for a second straight year in 2004, dropping 47 percent from 2003. In reality less than 20 people are hanged in Singapore per year, compared to say China who execute 27 per DAY. ( >10,000 p/a).

You say the deterrent does not work? I live in South Africa. Lets cut through the b/s of stats and look at reality since the abolition of death penalty in South Africa which has now resulted in unprecedented crime. Examples. rape every 26 SECONDS (yes SECONDS) and those are just the officially reported cases. Most rapes are not reported because of the <1% conviction rate. Murder rate is now 6 and hour. http://www.gunowners.org/fs0304.htm  
Maybe Third world and Eastern countries have a different view on crime and punishment, where civilized standards demand respect of human life, and accountability is a personal thing. That may be so in NZ, Oz, Canada, and UK, but not here, where we have more murders and rapes per DAY than ALL these above countries combined per YEAR.

Posted by Bruce MacMillan SOUTH AFRICA on Monday, 5 December 2005
Offensive? Unsuitable? Report This Comment
he is a goner by the time i have finish entering this message, wasted
Posted by Mr X on Friday, 2 December 2005
Offensive? Unsuitable? Report This Comment
Yes well that could be said as well MM - 1 difference though.......Had Van NOT imported the 400grams of Heroin which could of killed countless of innocent people - they would NOT have been in that predicament (of course they would of gotten it from someone else but that's another story).



Posted by TJC on Friday, 2 December 2005
Offensive? Unsuitable? Report This Comment
So it may rightly be argued, as by TJC, that Van knew the risks associated with his actions of smuggling drugs in Singapore and that he was the master of his own destiny. But aren't those who die as a result of heroin ODs also aware of the risks associated with their drug use and also in control of their own destiny? My point is that each of us is capable of making a poor decision (some more drastice than others) and who is qualified to decide that any person should be killed because of it?
Posted by MM on Thursday, 1 December 2005
Offensive? Unsuitable? Report This Comment
Just like we kill Iraqi and Afghani chidren in the name of what we believe in, so will Singaporeans kill ours in the name of what they believe in. Maybe we should clean up our own backyard first before pretending to be the global moral police. Van should live and it is inhumane to destroy someone like an animal, unfortunately we no longer have the moral high ground to demand this on basis of death penalty being barbaric. We kill, they kill, it's just the way world works and we seem to be fine with it 99% of the time. It's a shame John Howard has far more energy to put into promoting killing of thousands than into saving a single life, but that's today's Australia. Unfortunately.
Posted by SG on Monday, 28 November 2005
Offensive? Unsuitable? Report This Comment
Great comments.

My views differ slightly though.

Through the tragidy of Heroin, I have witnessed 3 high school friends OD and also a couple more in and out of jail which has ruined their life due to their Heroin Addictions that they are unable to kick for 1 reason or another.

All I'm saying is this, regardless of whichever country you reside in, the old saying of 'you do the crime, you do the time' exists. Now I know in this case it is not time we are talking about but a life, but I ask you this, did Van and also the Bali 9 know the RISK associated with carrying out their crimes in both Singapore & Bali??? I believe they did!!! Therefore, all I can say is WE are the master of our destiny's........I too can fly over to Singapore right now and choose to kill someone for example - knowing too well that if I get caught, the mandatory sentence in that country is death. However, if I choose to take that risk, that is my problem and I will have to deal with the circumstances should they arise because I am the only one making this decision, no-one is forcing me to do it!!!

And before you say that Van only did it to save his brother, all I can say is what a load of BOLLOCKS!!! You all talk about the media and all the crap we are fead and now you are telling me you believe Van ONLY done it to help his brother.........HYPOCRITICAL is all I can say folks!!! The debt was ONLY $25k, NOT $250K!!! If his brother OR family wanted to free his brothers debt desperately, I am SURE they could of raised that money with NO problem at all (where do they live again Glen Waverly??? Hmm, last time I checked Glen Waverly was quite an affluent suburb)!!!

I'm NOT buying all the crap and I say if ANYONE intends on going over to a foreign country which has a mandatory sentence of death for certain crimes and then you committ that crime knowing too well of the risk associated, then there should be NO mercy!!!

It's harsh you may say, but we live in a Democracy and that is my view!!!

Posted by TJC on Monday, 28 November 2005
Offensive? Unsuitable? Report This Comment
The best description if Singapore is : "The only shopping mall with its own death penalty."
Posted by Jack Fresh on Sunday, 27 November 2005
Offensive? Unsuitable? Report This Comment
The comments i've read have caused me to think ,I think no one has the right to decide that another should be executed ,execution as is shown of course prevents the particular pepertraitor from reoffending ,but history shows that a line of people to take his or her place is long.
The death penalty is silly and no one has the right to end a human life like that,sure punishment ,for the crime commited but is it not the 21st centuty?Is civilazation declining or is it just me?No one has the right to end someones life!It seems that many countries have a death penalty,I would like to see the statistics showing that a decline in crime follows this inhuman punishment.

Posted by ross cushing on Saturday, 26 November 2005
Offensive? Unsuitable? Report This Comment
If it's any consolation to you TC I think the death penalty is barbaric in any country because of its finality. It's nothing to do with Asian countries, I've visited lots of them and there's plenty of stuff they do better than western countries. I don't think trying to protect your citizens from harm inflicted by heavy handed laws involving statutory murder is trying to "tell Asian countries what to do". If an Aussie was about to be gassed in the US I, like a lot of Australians, would be extremely worked up as well, in fact the David Hicks situation is just as galling to me and a lot of people have made a lot of noise about that. Additionally just a point of history its a little hard for a lot of us to be colonial masters, many of us decended from criminals who were sent out here against their will a few hundred years ago, which is why I think its a very Australian thing to forgive people who go off the rails a little - hey Ned Kelly is an historical national treasure!
Thanks for your comments.

Posted by TK on Friday, 25 November 2005
Offensive? Unsuitable? Report This Comment
I have to agree TC. The fact is we will (Australia) will only get involved when it is a matter of political interest - an Australian being hanged. Although I don't agree with the death penalty, it is importntant to repect the laws held by neighbouring countries or any country for that matter. Would we ever impose ourselves on America's 'barbaric' laws, even if an Australian was to be hanged?
Posted by Asher on Friday, 25 November 2005
Offensive? Unsuitable? Report This Comment
Almost a fair point about America TC, except they only execute murderers. Carrying a bag of drugs in order to help out a brother in serious danger of being killed is not quite the same as killing another human being.
Posted by Martyn on Thursday, 24 November 2005
Offensive? Unsuitable? Report This Comment
Isn't it interesting how Australians feel they are entitled to tell Asian countries how they should be run (whether Indonesia or Singapore)? The 'barbarians' in Asia should be grateful that the 'civilized' people of Australia are behaving like colonial masters and teaching them how to live properly.
Funny how Australians don't make that much noise about the US, which executes more people than Singapore. Maybe that's because the US is not an Asian country, so it's not barbaric?

Posted by TC on Thursday, 24 November 2005
Offensive? Unsuitable? Report This Comment
Well said Tony Kelly
Posted by Level 8 on Thursday, 24 November 2005
Offensive? Unsuitable? Report This Comment
Post a comment
Your Comment: (no HTML, URLs are automatically converted to links)



Your name:


Your email address: (We won't display this)


Security Code:       



Please click the post button only once - it may take a moment for your post to go live. Our commenting system is encrypted to prevent comment spam. Your browser may ask you to accept a security certificate. That is normal and nothing to be worried about.
Notice: Any text between angle bracket '<' or '>' will get stripped

  home  |  campaigns  |  contact us  |  about us  |  privacy policy  |  advertising  | 
add my company  |  news archive  |  Disclaimer  |  subscribe  |  logout  
 
 


B&T Today, your daily insight into the world of marketing, advertising, PR and media.
 BACK ISSUES
 REGISTER HERE
 
Enter your email address to register or unregister