It was the biggest news in adland over the weekend, and now Sir Martin Sorrell’s exit from WPP could spark a massive change in the company’s make-up, according to analysts.
Here’s the letter Sorrell sent to WPP’s staff following his resignation:
To everyone at WPP,
For the past 33 years, I have spent every single day thinking about the future of WPP.
Over those decades, our family has grown and prospered.
We welcomed J. Walter Thompson, Ogilvy, Young & Rubicam, Grey, 24/7 Real Media, Taylor Nelson Sofres, among so many others.
We created Group M, including Xaxis and Essence.
We put the focus on Asia-Pacific, Latin America, Africa and the Middle East and Central Eastern Europe, the home of the next billion consumers. We embarked on the early development of digital capabilities; and the evolution of a firm-wide integrated client and country-centred approach.
Our holding company was recognised as the world’s best and most effective through the Cannes Lions and Effie Awards year after year after year.
We pioneered Atticus Awards for original written thinking…. the WPP Fellowship Awards to recognise promising talent…. the Partnership and Practice Awards for client-endorsed integrated market and case studies.
Our Stream digital conferences have attracted the best in the digital business for more than a decade.
Our Annual Sustainability and Pro Bono Reports highlight the unique social, environmental and public policy work that we do day in, day out across the globe.
As I look ahead, I see that the current disruption we are experiencing is simply putting too much unnecessary pressure on the business, our over 200,000 people and their 500,000 or so dependents, and the clients we serve in 112 countries.
That is why I have decided that in your interest, in the interest of our clients, in the interest of all shareowners, both big and small, and in the interest of all our other stakeholders, it is best for me to step aside.
We have had a succession plan in place for some time. A new generation of management, led by Mark Read and Andrew Scott (who have each been at WPP for approximately 20 years), are well qualified and experienced in the board’s opinion to deal with the geographic and technological opportunities and challenges our industry faces.
We have weathered difficult storms in the past. And our highly talented people have always won through, always.
Nobody, either direct competitors or newly-minted ones can beat the WPP team, as long as you work closely together, whether by client and/or country or digitally.
In the coming period, I will be available to the board and any of you, should you want help with anything, anywhere. I shall miss all of you greatly. You have given me such excitement and energy, and I wanted to thank you for everything you have done and will do for WPP and me.
As some of you know, my family has expanded recently, WPP will always be my baby too.
As a founder, I can say that WPP is not just a matter of life or death, it was, is and will be more important than that. Good fortune and Godspeed to all of you… now back to the future.
Who will replace Sorrell at WPP is the big question on everyone’s lips. However, one media analyst believes the question is a “red herring”, as the company’s shareholders want to break it up.
Speaking to Campaign, Cenkos Securities’ Alex de Groote said WPP’s constituent parts, particularly the health and digital divisions, are worth a lot more more than the group’s current share price, which has dropped more than 40 per cent from its peak in February last year.
According to de Groote, shareholders in other rivals such as Omnicom, Interpublic Group and Publicis Groupe would look to make similar moves if WPP did in fact break up, which he forecasts to all happen in the next 12 to 18 months.
“Once WPP breaks up, the pressure on the other guys will be irresistible,” he said.
However, if any of the the big ad groups were to stay as they are, de Groote reckons it would be Publicis, due to its ongoing restructuring, recent leadership changes and French business culture.