The Final Existential Threat To Adland: Remuneration

The Final Existential Threat To Adland: Remuneration
SHARE
THIS



B&T’s favourite opinionated columnist Robert Strohfeldt from Strohfeldt Consulting has penned his final piece in a four-part series on the existential threats to adland, starting with Identity, then progressing to cover Credibility and Competition. Today, he explores the issue of remuneration.

The vast majority of people working in the industry love what they do – something never to be taken for granted.  Every research study conducted into the primary reason for people changing jobs is surprisingly not for money. It is for job satisfaction.

Another of the changes I have seen over 30 years is the drop in salaries across the board for every role in agencies. This is not unique to advertising; wage growth has been stagnant for some time. But compare 2016 to 1983 and all agency jobs pay far less in real terms than the wages stagnation we have witnessed since the GFC.

The simple reason is that advertising agencies are nowhere near as profitable as they once were. But agency remuneration structure, though highly rewarding at the time, had an inherent weakness that the digital world has glaringly exposed.

There used to be a saying ‘Media Means Money’ – an agency was paid 10 per cent commission on the media expenditure, which was limited to mainstream, and a 7.5 per cent service fee on top of that plus production (print and electronic) charges – in some cases head hours for jobs outside of creating and producing ads.

Head hours was seen as a mug’s game, not particularly profitable and as a colleague once said “Only prostitutes and lawyers charge by the hour”.

Though the revenue stream was fabulous, we were in fact “giving away” the thinking and making money on commissions and the production.

Advertising agencies were originally “advertising agents” – as mentioned in the article on ‘Credibility‘; advertising agents bought press space for as little as possible and sold it to clients for as much as possible.

Essentially, they were retailers of press space, as opposed to providers of advice i.e. what is most beneficial for you (the client), as opposed to me (the vendor) was not how the system worked. Walk into any retailer today and ask, “Is this product any good?” I seriously doubt you will get the response, “It is a piece of shit”.

If a better option is recommended, even if it is the same price or cheaper than the original product enquired about, it will be because the margin is greater i.e. the benefit is always going to favour the retailer.

When creative was added to the service, the revenue came from the production and printing. But the really valuable stuff, the thinking, was literally given away for free.

In many ways, our industry still operates in a similar manner, that is, we give away the most valuable component of the overall service we provide and charge for superficial crap. Rather than solve problems, our industry became trapped into a system where revenue was only generated if media was bought and ads were produced.

Yes, there has been a shift to fee-based remuneration, but it is still biased towards making or booking something. For all the jokes made about lawyers, the bastards know how to bill – they bill in six minute increments. Yes, 10 to the hour and how they keep track of that is anyone guess. They have prostitutes covered there (both male and female). Even they wouldn’t have the gall to bill you for the time it takes to get undressed.

Lawyers also have the advantage of hundreds of bright young things all prepared to pretty much sell their souls to make equity partner. And to make equity partner, you firstly need a record of producing loads of billable hours. Very profitable having hundreds of minions, who you pay $2.50 an hour and charge out at $300 an hour. (Not quite $2.50, but the variance between what the bulk of associates are paid and the amount they are billed out for makes the three times head hours cost formula look like chump change.)

This approach is not only taken by lawyers. Accounting/advisory/management consulting firms all use a similar formula.

Apart from being a very profitable business model, their fee approach ensures they are seen as providers of advice and clients know (or should I say believe) they are paying for objective advice – they are paying for an intangible, which is quite a coup.

History always comes back to bite you on the bum in some way. We want to be seen as providers of advice and yet historically we have used commissions and “making something” as our primary form of billing. As an industry, we have never said “this is the idea and it will cost you $x”.

Of course to ensure the integrity of the idea from concept to finished product, we really need to produce it and that will be $y. But x should always be far greater than y.

In a digital world, with so many different forms or disciplines of communications/persuasion we have the opportunity to shift the billing model and charge for thinking. Ironic that an industry renowned for creativity doesn’t charge for it. Imagine artists giving away their paintings, only making money on marking up canvas, frames and paints, crayons etc.?

In essence, that is what the advertising industry has been doing for over 150 years. All of the fabulous ideas (both creative and media), essentially have been given away for free. And when something is free, you place very little value on it.

 

Please login with linkedin to comment

Latest News

Fintech Start-up InstaReM Names Aussie Cricketer Matthew Wade As Brand Ambassador
  • Marketing

Fintech Start-up InstaReM Names Aussie Cricketer Matthew Wade As Brand Ambassador

InstaReM, which offers international money transfers to individuals and businesses, has signed on Australian wicketkeeper Matthew Wade as the sports face of the brand. InstaReM lists Australia as its founding market, having begun life here in 2014. Since the company’s modest start in Australia, InstaReM has since successfully spread its wings to other corridors by […]

Arnott’s Launches Its ‘Santa’s Big Night’ Christmas Campaign Via TKT
  • Campaigns

Arnott’s Launches Its ‘Santa’s Big Night’ Christmas Campaign Via TKT

Arnott’s has launched its 2017 Christmas campaign via TKT Sydney, the first Christmas film for the quintessential Aussie brand. The campaign tells a unique Christmas story and puts a modern twist on the tradition of leaving a biscuit out for Santa. Tapping into the spirit of giving at Christmas, the film is a humorous insight […]

Clems Sydney Announces Five New Creative Hires
  • Advertising

Clems Sydney Announces Five New Creative Hires

Clemenger BBDO Sydney today announced five new creative hires – its second major injection of talent into the creative department since Ben Coulson, chief creative officer, joined the agency earlier this year. Vanessa Robinson moves over from M&C Saatchi Sydney to join as a senior art director partnered with Josh Aitken. Prior to M&C, she […]

Australia Is Diverse… Does Your Brand Have An Inclusive Digital Presence?
  • Marketing
  • Opinion

Australia Is Diverse… Does Your Brand Have An Inclusive Digital Presence?

As Australia continues to grow and the population becomes more ethnically diverse, it is important that marketers ensure digital environments are more inclusive, especially for those who don’t speak English as a first language, writes Siteimprove’s Haley Doel (pictured below). Having a readable and accessible website is no longer just a high priority for large […]

Opinion

by B&T Magazine

B&T Magazine
**FILE*** A Thursday, Oct. 21, 2010 file photo the Sydney Head Office of Network Ten in Pyrmont, Sydney. Network Ten's Wake Up program and its early, morning and late news will be axed from Friday. (AAP Image/Lee Besford) NO ARCHIVING
  • Advertising
  • Media

Network Ten And MCN Reaffirm Sales Agreement Following CBS Sale

Network Ten and Multi Channel Network (MCN) have today reaffirmed that the sales representation agreement, which sees MCN manage the advertising interests for TEN, ELEVEN, ONE and the online catch-up streaming platform tenplay, will continue. Since the agreement was made in 2015, the Network Ten and MCN trading relationship has been an outstanding success. In […]

by B&T Magazine

B&T Magazine
Pepsi MAX Teams Up With PHD & Time Out For New Data-driven Campaign
  • Advertising
  • Campaigns

Pepsi MAX Teams Up With PHD & Time Out For New Data-driven Campaign

Pepsi MAX has partnered with PHD and Time Out to not only inspire Australians, but also enhance their ability to ‘MAX’ out their summer this year. Through the use of a live dynamic data feed, consumers will be served ads by the brand on events taking place around them that are relevant to their personal […]

AI – To Join It Or To Beat It
  • Media
  • Opinion

AI – To Join It Or To Beat It

I'm afraid we can't let you read this piece Dave! That's a joke about A Space Odyssey 2001, young B&T readers.

Opinion

by B&T Magazine

B&T Magazine
AnalogFolk Opens In Shanghai
  • Advertising

AnalogFolk Opens In Shanghai

AnalogFolk has opened in Shanghai and, as B&T's trusty Funk & Wagnalls atlas tell us, is somewhere near Wollongong.